Template talk:EnergonWideloadMold: Difference between revisions
From MediaWiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
Created page with "Hey, wouldn't this model template have been worth keeping? It had six uses like Energon Wideload/Duststorm, right? ~~~~" |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
Hey, wouldn't this model template have been worth keeping? It had six uses like Energon Wideload/Duststorm, right? [[User:S.H.I.E.L.D. Agent 47|S.H.I.E.L.D. Agent 47]] ([[User talk:S.H.I.E.L.D. Agent 47|talk]]) 18:02, 29 October 2016 (EDT) | Hey, wouldn't this model template have been worth keeping? It had six uses like Energon Wideload/Duststorm, right? [[User:S.H.I.E.L.D. Agent 47|S.H.I.E.L.D. Agent 47]] ([[User talk:S.H.I.E.L.D. Agent 47|talk]]) 18:02, 29 October 2016 (EDT) | ||
:Artificially inflated with ''Super Link'' which knocks out two uses (and the only reason those are listed separately from the Hasbro versions are because they were sold in a box set rather than individually), and the other Energon use would be mentioned in the opening paragraph. That leaves only two other characters who use this mold. And the point of the template is when a mold is used so much that a text paragraph is too bulky and cumbersome to properly convey the info. The left-over two bots is not too bulky. --[[User:M Sipher|M Sipher]] ([[User talk:M Sipher|talk]]) 18:57, 29 October 2016 (EDT) | |||
Latest revision as of 22:57, 29 October 2016
Hey, wouldn't this model template have been worth keeping? It had six uses like Energon Wideload/Duststorm, right? S.H.I.E.L.D. Agent 47 (talk) 18:02, 29 October 2016 (EDT)
- Artificially inflated with Super Link which knocks out two uses (and the only reason those are listed separately from the Hasbro versions are because they were sold in a box set rather than individually), and the other Energon use would be mentioned in the opening paragraph. That leaves only two other characters who use this mold. And the point of the template is when a mold is used so much that a text paragraph is too bulky and cumbersome to properly convey the info. The left-over two bots is not too bulky. --M Sipher (talk) 18:57, 29 October 2016 (EDT)

