Talk:Tankor (disambiguation): Difference between revisions

From MediaWiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 2: Line 2:
:Agreed. See [[Lugnut]].--[[User:Jimsorenson|Jimsorenson]] ([[User talk:Jimsorenson|talk]]) 15:48, 2 November 2016 (EDT)
:Agreed. See [[Lugnut]].--[[User:Jimsorenson|Jimsorenson]] ([[User talk:Jimsorenson|talk]]) 15:48, 2 November 2016 (EDT)
::Agreed, but not on Octane being Tankor forever.  His TR version is in store listings as "Octane."  Which isn't ironclad, but if they can get Hot Rod and Trailbreaker back... --[[User:ItsWalky|ItsWalky]] ([[User talk:ItsWalky|talk]]) 16:24, 2 November 2016 (EDT)
::Agreed, but not on Octane being Tankor forever.  His TR version is in store listings as "Octane."  Which isn't ironclad, but if they can get Hot Rod and Trailbreaker back... --[[User:ItsWalky|ItsWalky]] ([[User talk:ItsWalky|talk]]) 16:24, 2 November 2016 (EDT)
:::<nowiki>*</nowiki>''shrugs''* We'll see how that plays out. I'm not vehement on either direction. I sorta feel like he's been "Tankor" long enough to belong on the page (especially given the popular comics' "Tall Tankor/Fat Tankor" thing), but ehn. I don't feel real strong about it either way.--[[User:M Sipher|M Sipher]] ([[User talk:M Sipher|talk]]) 16:29, 2 November 2016 (EDT)

Revision as of 20:29, 2 November 2016

I'd just like to say that, yeah, you actually can completely justify only having one "Major _____" up top. Sometimes there IS only one "major" character with a name used by a lot of schmucks. It happens. As it stands, I think we're probably looking at a long-term name change to "Tankor" for Octane, so sure, he should probably go up here... but even if he didn't, then BM Tankor totally deserves to be separated up top. --M Sipher (talk) 14:39, 2 November 2016 (EDT)

Agreed. See Lugnut.--Jimsorenson (talk) 15:48, 2 November 2016 (EDT)
Agreed, but not on Octane being Tankor forever. His TR version is in store listings as "Octane." Which isn't ironclad, but if they can get Hot Rod and Trailbreaker back... --ItsWalky (talk) 16:24, 2 November 2016 (EDT)
*shrugs* We'll see how that plays out. I'm not vehement on either direction. I sorta feel like he's been "Tankor" long enough to belong on the page (especially given the popular comics' "Tall Tankor/Fat Tankor" thing), but ehn. I don't feel real strong about it either way.--M Sipher (talk) 16:29, 2 November 2016 (EDT)