Talk:Warriorbot

I want it on record that I object to legitimizing this by giving it an article beyond one for the product on which it appears. - Chris McFeely (talk) 19:05, 25 November 2017 (EST)

I agree. --Thylacine 2000 (talk) 19:12, 25 November 2017 (EST)

Except we don't usually give things like the sign pages in the first place? Keeping it on a page 90% dedicated to explaining why it happened and how it barely counts feels in keeping with our standards. I didn't put the image on the insignia page for that reason. --Riptide (talk) 19:25, 25 November 2017 (EST)

No, I also object to this being a page. It's a @#$%ing error based on poor research. We're not making a Dicepticon page, or seriously linking Grotusque or Mainframe to Protectobot pages. The only place "Warriorbot" should be found on a LEGIT Transformers wiki is in the Notes section of the Insignia page, explaining this screw-up. --Xaaron (talk) 19:51, 25 November 2017 (EST)

Delete this page and bury the information somewhere no one will find it. --ItsWalky (talk) 23:13, 25 November 2017 (EST)

It seems very clear that this is an error, nothing more. Dicepticons clinches that rather succinctly. --Jimsorenson (talk) 00:17, 26 November 2017 (EST)

Kill it. --M Sipher (talk) 00:38, 26 November 2017 (EST)

Redirect it? - TBR (talk) 04:11, 26 November 2017 (EST)

I thought about doing that, but was torn between "it might help someone who is confused by a term on an official product" versus "it might potentially add an air of legitimacy to the term" so I figured wait for more discussion. --abates (talk) 04:47, 26 November 2017 (EST)