Talk:Drydock (BWU): Difference between revisions

From MediaWiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
Escargon (talk | contribs)
Escargon (talk | contribs)
Line 2: Line 2:


No, really, why is this guy separate from [[Drydock (TF2010)]] but Katilla is covered on the [[Catilla (DOTM)]] page? The two BWU characters seem to be parallel cases, but the outcomes are radically different. Why? --[[User:Khajidha|Khajidha]] ([[User talk:Khajidha|talk]]) 10:07, 20 July 2019 (EDT)
No, really, why is this guy separate from [[Drydock (TF2010)]] but Katilla is covered on the [[Catilla (DOTM)]] page? The two BWU characters seem to be parallel cases, but the outcomes are radically different. Why? --[[User:Khajidha|Khajidha]] ([[User talk:Khajidha|talk]]) 10:07, 20 July 2019 (EDT)
:I imagine it's a left-over period when we were in flux of whether or not to place cross-continuity guys on the same page. It looks like we've mostly opted for the way Drydock's page is presented now, even if that's more inconvenient.
:I imagine it's a left-over period when we were in flux of whether or not to place cross-continuity guys on the same page. It looks like we've mostly opted for the way Drydock's page is presented now, even if that's more inconvenient. [[User:Escargon|Escargon]] ([[User talk:Escargon|talk]]) 10:27, 20 July 2019 (EDT)

Revision as of 14:27, 20 July 2019

Why 2 pages?

No, really, why is this guy separate from Drydock (TF2010) but Katilla is covered on the Catilla (DOTM) page? The two BWU characters seem to be parallel cases, but the outcomes are radically different. Why? --Khajidha (talk) 10:07, 20 July 2019 (EDT)

I imagine it's a left-over period when we were in flux of whether or not to place cross-continuity guys on the same page. It looks like we've mostly opted for the way Drydock's page is presented now, even if that's more inconvenient. Escargon (talk) 10:27, 20 July 2019 (EDT)