Talk:The Burden Hardest to Bear: Difference between revisions
Cyberlink420 (talk | contribs) |
|||
| Line 17: | Line 17: | ||
::::::Yes, he, and yes, I meant removing this talk section. But I see that isn't happening. [[User:Cylasbreakdown|Cylasbreakdown]] ([[User talk:Cylasbreakdown|talk]]) 21:48, 11 March 2018 (EDT) | ::::::Yes, he, and yes, I meant removing this talk section. But I see that isn't happening. [[User:Cylasbreakdown|Cylasbreakdown]] ([[User talk:Cylasbreakdown|talk]]) 21:48, 11 March 2018 (EDT) | ||
:::::::This is a really bad hill to fight on. It's an inappropriate joke that isn't funny either, and I say we should take a whole entire 2 seconds to replace it. --[[User:Thylacine 2000|Thylacine 2000]] ([[User talk:Thylacine 2000|talk]]) 10:34, 1 September 2020 (EDT) | :::::::This is a really bad hill to fight on. It's an inappropriate joke that isn't funny either, and I say we should take a whole entire 2 seconds to replace it. --[[User:Thylacine 2000|Thylacine 2000]] ([[User talk:Thylacine 2000|talk]]) 10:34, 1 September 2020 (EDT) | ||
::::::::It's really not. An "inappropriate" caption would be one that mocks someone based on race, gender, orientation, disability, etc., or one that makes light of serious subjects like assault or real life tragedies. Simply acknowledging that some people have sex with multiple partners isn't inherently inappropriate. Besides, every time the caption has been changed, it's been brought up and discussed on the Discord, and everyone agrees that it's not over the line and still pretty funny, including admins. We're still a PG-13 wiki, so we're allowed to have some edge as long as it's not being used to perpetuate bigotry. -- [[User:Cyberlink420|Cyberlink420]] ([[User talk:Cyberlink420|talk]]) 12:35, 1 September 2020 (EDT) | |||
Revision as of 16:35, 1 September 2020
Errors swiped from Zob's site
Anyway, it's not like BOTH Stunticons couldn't have an oil slick gimmick -- it seems almost requisite for an evil alien robot car. "This guy did something that he never did before and we saw someone else do once!" isn't much of an error. -- Repowers 10:24, 27 September 2009 (EDT)
- Hence why I didn't worst rewrite in the history of ever that one. --Detour 11:56, 27 September 2009 (EDT)
My wife Rosemary Ward-Tuski and I have recently acquired some scripts from voice actor Neil Ross from back in the day, among them this particular episode. It is worth noting that in the script Neil Ross used, it was indeed Runamuck and Runabout that sent Rodimus off the cliff, causing him to lose the matrix. This could explain why they're referred to R and R in the japanese dub. --Raggletag
Can we PLEASE get rid of the Defensor/Bruticus joke?
Please?
Removing on March 8th if no one objects on this talk page by then.
- No. If you’re too soft for the wiki, then go bother people elsewhere on the Internet. S.H.I.E.L.D. Agent 47 (talk) 17:13, 4 March 2018 (EST)
- I'm not too soft for the wiki, I'm just bothered by that really inappropriate joke. Cylasbreakdown (talk) 17:55, 4 March 2018 (EST)
- Upon notice from Jalaguy, I am going to stop now. Do I have your permission to delete this section?
- That's not stopping, that's persisting. -- Dark T Zeratul (talk) 04:42, 6 March 2018 (EST)
- I think he(?) meant removing this talk section, but there is no reason to do that.--Khajidha (talk) 06:47, 6 March 2018 (EST)
- Yes, he, and yes, I meant removing this talk section. But I see that isn't happening. Cylasbreakdown (talk) 21:48, 11 March 2018 (EDT)
- This is a really bad hill to fight on. It's an inappropriate joke that isn't funny either, and I say we should take a whole entire 2 seconds to replace it. --Thylacine 2000 (talk) 10:34, 1 September 2020 (EDT)
- It's really not. An "inappropriate" caption would be one that mocks someone based on race, gender, orientation, disability, etc., or one that makes light of serious subjects like assault or real life tragedies. Simply acknowledging that some people have sex with multiple partners isn't inherently inappropriate. Besides, every time the caption has been changed, it's been brought up and discussed on the Discord, and everyone agrees that it's not over the line and still pretty funny, including admins. We're still a PG-13 wiki, so we're allowed to have some edge as long as it's not being used to perpetuate bigotry. -- Cyberlink420 (talk) 12:35, 1 September 2020 (EDT)
- This is a really bad hill to fight on. It's an inappropriate joke that isn't funny either, and I say we should take a whole entire 2 seconds to replace it. --Thylacine 2000 (talk) 10:34, 1 September 2020 (EDT)
- Yes, he, and yes, I meant removing this talk section. But I see that isn't happening. Cylasbreakdown (talk) 21:48, 11 March 2018 (EDT)
- I think he(?) meant removing this talk section, but there is no reason to do that.--Khajidha (talk) 06:47, 6 March 2018 (EST)
- That's not stopping, that's persisting. -- Dark T Zeratul (talk) 04:42, 6 March 2018 (EST)
- Upon notice from Jalaguy, I am going to stop now. Do I have your permission to delete this section?
- I'm not too soft for the wiki, I'm just bothered by that really inappropriate joke. Cylasbreakdown (talk) 17:55, 4 March 2018 (EST)

