Talk:Terrorsaur (BW): Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
|||
| Line 9: | Line 9: | ||
==Packaging== | ==Packaging== | ||
I've noticed how on more recent toys the wiki has been listing in-package mis-transformations. Well, I recently bought a MOSC basic Terrorsaur and I opened it for my birthday.(I know, I am a horrible person) and i noticed that he was mis-transformed to fit in the bubble, his beast mode legs weren't in their tabs the way they're supposed to be; instead, they were in the arm configuration and just layed flat next to the robot mode legs. Is this worthy of note? [[User:Stevo|Stevo]] 13:15, 13 June 2013 (EDT) | I've noticed how on more recent toys the wiki has been listing in-package mis-transformations. Well, I recently bought a MOSC basic Terrorsaur and I opened it for my birthday.(I know, I am a horrible person) and i noticed that he was mis-transformed to fit in the bubble, his beast mode legs weren't in their tabs the way they're supposed to be; instead, they were in the arm configuration and just layed flat next to the robot mode legs. Is this worthy of note? [[User:Stevo|Stevo]] 13:15, 13 June 2013 (EDT) | ||
No. That is for easier packaging, not a mistransformation or misassembly. [[User:Saix|Saix]] ([[User talk:Saix|talk]]) 11:43, 1 July 2025 (EDT) | |||
Revision as of 15:43, 1 July 2025
Is Terrorsaur's pre-beast form based on any existing toy? --FortMax 19:22, 6 October 2006 (UTC)
- No. Like Scorponok and Tarantulas, he looks like a mechy version of his BW body. --ItsWalky 19:40, 6 October 2006 (UTC)
- Info from the BotCon guy. The non-toy guys were based loosely on other toys toys. Like, Scorponok looks a heck of a lot like Energon Scorponok. With that in mind, I'd like to know what toy they had in mind for Terrorsaur and Tarantulas. --Crockalley 23:23, 6 October 2006 (UTC)
While neither species had been discovered yet, Terrorsaur's beast mode bears resemblance to Ludodactylus and Caulkicephalus, having a pretty stereotypical "pterosaur" look but also teeth.
Roverlord (talk) 11:04, 1 July 2025 (EDT)
Packaging
I've noticed how on more recent toys the wiki has been listing in-package mis-transformations. Well, I recently bought a MOSC basic Terrorsaur and I opened it for my birthday.(I know, I am a horrible person) and i noticed that he was mis-transformed to fit in the bubble, his beast mode legs weren't in their tabs the way they're supposed to be; instead, they were in the arm configuration and just layed flat next to the robot mode legs. Is this worthy of note? Stevo 13:15, 13 June 2013 (EDT) No. That is for easier packaging, not a mistransformation or misassembly. Saix (talk) 11:43, 1 July 2025 (EDT)
