Talk:Trukk not munky: Difference between revisions
From MediaWiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
Deceptitran (talk | contribs) |
→Primal not Prime: new section |
||
| Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
Does it really make sense to have [[Geewun]] redirect here, considering there's no actual mention of "Geewun" on the page? --[[User:Andrusi|Andrusi]] 03:02, 24 October 2006 (UTC) | Does it really make sense to have [[Geewun]] redirect here, considering there's no actual mention of "Geewun" on the page? --[[User:Andrusi|Andrusi]] 03:02, 24 October 2006 (UTC) | ||
: I agree. It's gone. Also, I don't think there should be a real GeeWun page until the term has existed for more than a year. Y'know, make sure it has more long-lasting relevance. --[[User:ItsWalky|ItsWalky]] 03:57, 24 October 2006 (UTC) | : I agree. It's gone. Also, I don't think there should be a real GeeWun page until the term has existed for more than a year. Y'know, make sure it has more long-lasting relevance. --[[User:ItsWalky|ItsWalky]] 03:57, 24 October 2006 (UTC) | ||
== Primal not Prime == | |||
Should we make any mention of the fact that Optimus Primal ISN'T the same character as Optimus Prime either? --[[User:Loudstone|Loudstone]] 16:24, 20 April 2009 (EDT) | |||
Revision as of 20:24, 20 April 2009
Should there be any mention of the 'Munky Not Trukk' variation?
- I don't think so. I've not really seen it used other than very seldomly as an ironic inversion of the original phrase. --ItsWalky 00:32, 23 September 2006 (UTC)
Does it really make sense to have Geewun redirect here, considering there's no actual mention of "Geewun" on the page? --Andrusi 03:02, 24 October 2006 (UTC)
- I agree. It's gone. Also, I don't think there should be a real GeeWun page until the term has existed for more than a year. Y'know, make sure it has more long-lasting relevance. --ItsWalky 03:57, 24 October 2006 (UTC)
Primal not Prime
Should we make any mention of the fact that Optimus Primal ISN'T the same character as Optimus Prime either? --Loudstone 16:24, 20 April 2009 (EDT)
