Help:Citing sources: Difference between revisions
From MediaWiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
m Restore from cache |
mNo edit summary |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
[[Image:Proper citation.jpg|thumb|Now you know why we win the Botcon trivia contest.]] | [[Image:Proper citation.jpg|thumb|Now you know why we win the [[Board Wars|Botcon trivia contest]].]] | ||
When creating detailed write-ups, it is important to consult the original source material and document ''which'' material you're referring to if it is not obvious. | When creating detailed write-ups, it is important to consult the original source material and document ''which'' material you're referring to if it is not obvious. | ||
Revision as of 10:55, 15 May 2009
When creating detailed write-ups, it is important to consult the original source material and document which material you're referring to if it is not obvious.
Sections of articles needing such citation can be marked using the {{fact}} template.[citation needed]
If we wanted vaguely worded, error-filled generalizations about how people remember things being, we'd go to Wikipedia.
- For further information, see: Wikipedia:citing sources
External Links
- Simplified examples of MLA style (not necessarily the best way to cite, but a method.)
