Talk:Cloning: Difference between revisions

From MediaWiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
Eire (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 4: Line 4:
==RiD==
==RiD==
Since Scourge's body is technically a partial clone of Prime's, should he be included? [[User:Eire]] 01.02 Aug 6 09 (UTC)
Since Scourge's body is technically a partial clone of Prime's, should he be included? [[User:Eire]] 01.02 Aug 6 09 (UTC)
==Nemesis Prime==
Aren't most Nemesis Primes (Nemeses Prime?) clones of their respective Optimi/Optimuses?[[Special:Contributions/70.17.201.221|70.17.201.221]] 23:49, 27 December 2010 (EST)
==Megaplex==
Isn't Machine Wars Megaplex a clone of Machine Wars Megatron?[[Special:Contributions/70.17.201.221|70.17.201.221]] 23:49, 27 December 2010 (EST)

Revision as of 04:49, 28 December 2010

Jet Twins as "Clones"

Rise of Safeguard states that Jetfire and Jetstorm were normal already-existing Autobots who grew from protoforms, who were then modified by Perceptor & co. I realize that the toy bio implies they were created as clones, but doesn't the actual fiction take precedence? --Jeysie 13:06, 27 May 2009 (EDT)

A note would be appropriate explaining the discrepancy, but toy bios are "actual fiction." - Starfield 13:15, 27 May 2009 (EDT)

RiD

Since Scourge's body is technically a partial clone of Prime's, should he be included? User:Eire 01.02 Aug 6 09 (UTC)

Nemesis Prime

Aren't most Nemesis Primes (Nemeses Prime?) clones of their respective Optimi/Optimuses?70.17.201.221 23:49, 27 December 2010 (EST)

Megaplex

Isn't Machine Wars Megaplex a clone of Machine Wars Megatron?70.17.201.221 23:49, 27 December 2010 (EST)