Talk:Caliber Mini-Con Team: Difference between revisions
From MediaWiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
RolonBolon (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
The Caliber campaign was Japan-only, and had nothing to do with the name of Sonic Convoy's attack. Wing Saber is not Sonic Bomber, Wing Saber does not use Galaxy Calibur as an attack...Cybertron is not Galaxy Force. This is all misleading and needs to be corrected and refined. -Bodycount | The Caliber campaign was Japan-only, and had nothing to do with the name of Sonic Convoy's attack. Wing Saber is not Sonic Bomber, Wing Saber does not use Galaxy Calibur as an attack...Cybertron is not Galaxy Force. This is all misleading and needs to be corrected and refined. -Bodycount | ||
I suggest that you eat me. - [[User:RolonBolon|RolonBolon]] 05:19, 13 April 2006 (UTC)<div id="wikia-credits"><br /><br /><small>From [http://transformers.wikia.com Teletraan I: The Transformers Wiki], a [http://www.wikia.com Wikia] wiki.</small></div> | I suggest that you eat me. - [[User:RolonBolon|RolonBolon]] 05:19, 13 April 2006 (UTC) | ||
Suffice to say, I completely and utterly disagree with your contentions. I see no VALID reason to differentiate them. The attack name is something that can be researched and correctd if neccessary, but everything else stays. --[[User:M Sipher|M Sipher]] 05:20, 13 April 2006 (UTC)<div id="wikia-credits"><br /><br /><small>From [http://transformers.wikia.com Teletraan I: The Transformers Wiki], a [http://www.wikia.com Wikia] wiki.</small></div> | |||
Revision as of 05:20, 13 April 2006
The Caliber campaign was Japan-only, and had nothing to do with the name of Sonic Convoy's attack. Wing Saber is not Sonic Bomber, Wing Saber does not use Galaxy Calibur as an attack...Cybertron is not Galaxy Force. This is all misleading and needs to be corrected and refined. -Bodycount
I suggest that you eat me. - RolonBolon 05:19, 13 April 2006 (UTC)
Suffice to say, I completely and utterly disagree with your contentions. I see no VALID reason to differentiate them. The attack name is something that can be researched and correctd if neccessary, but everything else stays. --M Sipher 05:20, 13 April 2006 (UTC)
