Talk:Body-type: Difference between revisions
From MediaWiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
No edit summary |
Deceptitran (talk | contribs) m BOT: replacing (1) links to "Drones" with "Drone" |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
Do [[drones]] belong on this list? After all, they have their own page. It seems duplicative to me.--[[User:Jimsorenson|Jimsorenson]] 12:01, 9 August 2009 (EDT) | Do [[Drone|drones]] belong on this list? After all, they have their own page. It seems duplicative to me.--[[User:Jimsorenson|Jimsorenson]] 12:01, 9 August 2009 (EDT) | ||
:Drones are just that, drones, while body-types are simply re-uses of bodies between two or more full personalities. [[Special:Contributions/76.252.0.101|76.252.0.101]] 21:32, 9 August 2009 (EDT) | :Drones are just that, drones, while body-types are simply re-uses of bodies between two or more full personalities. [[Special:Contributions/76.252.0.101|76.252.0.101]] 21:32, 9 August 2009 (EDT) | ||
Revision as of 11:32, 21 November 2009
Do drones belong on this list? After all, they have their own page. It seems duplicative to me.--Jimsorenson 12:01, 9 August 2009 (EDT)
- Drones are just that, drones, while body-types are simply re-uses of bodies between two or more full personalities. 76.252.0.101 21:32, 9 August 2009 (EDT)
1) The ROTF bike chicks are actually quite different. 2) I agree drones shouldn't be included. - Starfield 21:20, 7 November 2009 (EST)
- OK, Anonymous and Starfield agree with me ... anyone else? If no one feel strongly about it, I'm gonna torch the drone section of the movie 'body types', since in my view hordes of drones is an entirely different phenomena. --Jimsorenson 22:04, 7 November 2009 (EST)
Can someone tell me how the "Outstanding examples" section became a "list every shared body ever" section? --ItsWalky 22:47, 7 November 2009 (EST)
- Okay, I've pared it down considerably. Dude, if we started listing every guy who shared another body with another guy, WE'D BE LISTING THE ENTIRE WIKI. --ItsWalky 01:29, 8 November 2009 (EST)
