Talk:Transformers: Universe (2003 toyline): Difference between revisions
From MediaWiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
mNo edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
This page is bullshit. It's badly-written and full of opinions, not facts. In fact, I question even HAVING a (toyline) page for any given franchise/line. --[[User:M Sipher|M Sipher]] 07:17, 24 April 2006 (UTC)<div id="wikia-credits"><br /><br /><small>From [http://transformers.wikia.com Teletraan I: The Transformers Wiki], a [http://www.wikia.com Wikia] wiki.</small></div> | This page is bullshit. It's badly-written and full of opinions, not facts. In fact, I question even HAVING a (toyline) page for any given franchise/line. --[[User:M Sipher|M Sipher]] 07:17, 24 April 2006 (UTC) | ||
:While I'm inclined to agree that this page needs vast revision, I don't see why a (toyline) page, arguably the most factually verifiable of any kind of information we could put *in* this encyclopedia, would be inappropriate. Some have argued that toy lists already exist elsewhere on the web, and this is certainly true. But I do not see this as sufficient reason to not have (toyline) pages at all. All that means (to me) is that the ''focus'' of this Wiki should be on other aspects not already covered elsewhere.--[[User:G.B. Blackrock|G.B. Blackrock]] 14:17, 24 April 2006 (UTC)<div id="wikia-credits"><br /><br /><small>From [http://transformers.wikia.com Teletraan I: The Transformers Wiki], a [http://www.wikia.com Wikia] wiki.</small></div> | |||
Revision as of 14:17, 24 April 2006
This page is bullshit. It's badly-written and full of opinions, not facts. In fact, I question even HAVING a (toyline) page for any given franchise/line. --M Sipher 07:17, 24 April 2006 (UTC)
- While I'm inclined to agree that this page needs vast revision, I don't see why a (toyline) page, arguably the most factually verifiable of any kind of information we could put *in* this encyclopedia, would be inappropriate. Some have argued that toy lists already exist elsewhere on the web, and this is certainly true. But I do not see this as sufficient reason to not have (toyline) pages at all. All that means (to me) is that the focus of this Wiki should be on other aspects not already covered elsewhere.--G.B. Blackrock 14:17, 24 April 2006 (UTC)
