Talk:Greasepit (Micromaster): Difference between revisions
From MediaWiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
--[[User:M Sipher|M Sipher]] 04:32, 12 May 2006 (UTC) | --[[User:M Sipher|M Sipher]] 04:32, 12 May 2006 (UTC) | ||
: We did get rid of it once before. I don't have a strong opinion on it, though. --[[User:ItsWalky|ItsWalky]] 05:21, 12 May 2006 (UTC) | : We did get rid of it once before. I don't have a strong opinion on it, though. --[[User:ItsWalky|ItsWalky]] 05:21, 12 May 2006 (UTC) | ||
:: I think it runs the risk of over-categorizing things. Not that there aren't a ton of entries that would be relevant... but I dunno. It feels like if you do that, you might as well open up Categories for, say "Die-Cast Parts" or "Has Electronics", and that feels silly to me. And not the good silly. --[[User:M Sipher|M Sipher]] 05:40, 12 May 2006 (UTC)<div id="wikia-credits"><br /><br /><small>From [http://transformers.wikia.com Teletraan I: The Transformers Wiki], a [http://www.wikia.com Wikia] wiki.</small></div> | :: I think it runs the risk of over-categorizing things. Not that there aren't a ton of entries that would be relevant... but I dunno. It feels like if you do that, you might as well open up Categories for, say "Die-Cast Parts" or "Has Electronics", and that feels silly to me. And not the good silly. --[[User:M Sipher|M Sipher]] 05:40, 12 May 2006 (UTC) | ||
::: I'm actually of the opinion that we have too many categories as it is. But I've been reducing my involvement, anyway, so I don't expect to make a big deal one way or the other.--[[User:G.B. Blackrock|G.B. Blackrock]] 17:21, 12 May 2006 (UTC)<div id="wikia-credits"><br /><br /><small>From [http://transformers.wikia.com Teletraan I: The Transformers Wiki], a [http://www.wikia.com Wikia] wiki.</small></div> | |||
Revision as of 17:21, 12 May 2006
Two things on the "Recolors" Category...
A) "Redeco".
B) Do we really NEED this Category?
--M Sipher 04:32, 12 May 2006 (UTC)
- We did get rid of it once before. I don't have a strong opinion on it, though. --ItsWalky 05:21, 12 May 2006 (UTC)
- I think it runs the risk of over-categorizing things. Not that there aren't a ton of entries that would be relevant... but I dunno. It feels like if you do that, you might as well open up Categories for, say "Die-Cast Parts" or "Has Electronics", and that feels silly to me. And not the good silly. --M Sipher 05:40, 12 May 2006 (UTC)
- I'm actually of the opinion that we have too many categories as it is. But I've been reducing my involvement, anyway, so I don't expect to make a big deal one way or the other.--G.B. Blackrock 17:21, 12 May 2006 (UTC)
- I think it runs the risk of over-categorizing things. Not that there aren't a ton of entries that would be relevant... but I dunno. It feels like if you do that, you might as well open up Categories for, say "Die-Cast Parts" or "Has Electronics", and that feels silly to me. And not the good silly. --M Sipher 05:40, 12 May 2006 (UTC)
