User talk:Alientraveller/Alpha Trion: Difference between revisions
From MediaWiki
Jump to navigationJump to searchNo edit summary |
mNo edit summary |
||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
:I for one am in favour of this. I don't think any of the Alpha Trion pages are so long that combining them creates an unwieldy or infeasible article. - [[User:Chris McFeely|Chris McFeely]] 08:56, 11 August 2010 (EDT) | :I for one am in favour of this. I don't think any of the Alpha Trion pages are so long that combining them creates an unwieldy or infeasible article. - [[User:Chris McFeely|Chris McFeely]] 08:56, 11 August 2010 (EDT) | ||
:I like it and would have no problem with this merger. Our current note-dependent version was a compromise to assuage a few vocal opponents of cross-continuity, but I always thought that was a rather silly viewpoint so mergers cool with me. -ZacWilliam (not signed in) --[[Special:Contributions/76.28.76.206|76.28.76.206]] 08:58, 11 August 2010 (EDT) | :I like it and would have no problem with this merger. Our current note-dependent version was a compromise to assuage a few vocal opponents of cross-continuity, but I always thought that was a rather silly viewpoint so mergers cool with me. -ZacWilliam (not signed in) --[[Special:Contributions/76.28.76.206|76.28.76.206]] 08:58, 11 August 2010 (EDT) | ||
:I like it. I never did think that most of the A3s were that cumbersome to merge, you have proven me correct. I think as we go forward and learn more about the multiversal singularities and the new "aligned continuity" many past objections will be handled by the fiction.--[[User:Khajidha|Khajidha]] 09:05, 11 August 2010 (EDT) | |||
Revision as of 13:05, 11 August 2010
So, what do my fellow editors think? Alientraveller 08:29, 11 August 2010 (EDT)
- I for one am in favour of this. I don't think any of the Alpha Trion pages are so long that combining them creates an unwieldy or infeasible article. - Chris McFeely 08:56, 11 August 2010 (EDT)
- I like it and would have no problem with this merger. Our current note-dependent version was a compromise to assuage a few vocal opponents of cross-continuity, but I always thought that was a rather silly viewpoint so mergers cool with me. -ZacWilliam (not signed in) --76.28.76.206 08:58, 11 August 2010 (EDT)
- I like it. I never did think that most of the A3s were that cumbersome to merge, you have proven me correct. I think as we go forward and learn more about the multiversal singularities and the new "aligned continuity" many past objections will be handled by the fiction.--Khajidha 09:05, 11 August 2010 (EDT)
