Talk:C.H.U.G.: Difference between revisions
From MediaWiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
Interrobang (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
mNo edit summary |
||
| Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
:::::That doesn't mean it warrants an article. Terms like "Bayformers" are even more widespread but don't get an article. --[[User:Detour|Detour]] 15:24, 2 June 2011 (EDT) | :::::That doesn't mean it warrants an article. Terms like "Bayformers" are even more widespread but don't get an article. --[[User:Detour|Detour]] 15:24, 2 June 2011 (EDT) | ||
::::::Not to mention it's already outdated with the presence of ''United'' and Reveal the Shield. It will inevitably be more so when the next "classic" line comes out. "CHUG" is a very transient term, like "Classics 2.0". [[User:Interrobang|—Interrobang]] 15:35, 2 June 2011 (EDT) | ::::::Not to mention it's already outdated with the presence of ''United'' and Reveal the Shield. It will inevitably be more so when the next "classic" line comes out. "CHUG" is a very transient term, like "Classics 2.0". [[User:Interrobang|—Interrobang]] 15:35, 2 June 2011 (EDT) | ||
:::::::And several "Universe" figures used Unicron Trilogy molds. Do those count? If so, how is the "CHUG" aesthetic differentiated from the "UT" aesthetic? --[[User:Khajidha|Khajidha]] 15:40, 2 June 2011 (EDT) | |||
Revision as of 19:40, 2 June 2011
Do we need this? Is this term really that widely used? --Khajidha 11:17, 2 June 2011 (EDT)
- No and no. —Interrobang 11:28, 2 June 2011 (EDT)
- I see it used a lot, otherwise I wouldn't have created it.--MistaTee 13:37, 2 June 2011 (EDT)
- It's used quite a lot, though it's usually "CHUG". --FFN 13:44, 2 June 2011 (EDT)
- Yeah, it's near impossible to not see the term CHUG used in a discussion about the Classics/Universe/Henkei Henkei/Generations aesthetic. It's pretty dumb, but it's omnipresent on the TF fanboards. Antimatter 14:52, 2 June 2011 (EDT)
- That doesn't mean it warrants an article. Terms like "Bayformers" are even more widespread but don't get an article. --Detour 15:24, 2 June 2011 (EDT)
- Not to mention it's already outdated with the presence of United and Reveal the Shield. It will inevitably be more so when the next "classic" line comes out. "CHUG" is a very transient term, like "Classics 2.0". —Interrobang 15:35, 2 June 2011 (EDT)
- And several "Universe" figures used Unicron Trilogy molds. Do those count? If so, how is the "CHUG" aesthetic differentiated from the "UT" aesthetic? --Khajidha 15:40, 2 June 2011 (EDT)
- Not to mention it's already outdated with the presence of United and Reveal the Shield. It will inevitably be more so when the next "classic" line comes out. "CHUG" is a very transient term, like "Classics 2.0". —Interrobang 15:35, 2 June 2011 (EDT)
- That doesn't mean it warrants an article. Terms like "Bayformers" are even more widespread but don't get an article. --Detour 15:24, 2 June 2011 (EDT)
- Yeah, it's near impossible to not see the term CHUG used in a discussion about the Classics/Universe/Henkei Henkei/Generations aesthetic. It's pretty dumb, but it's omnipresent on the TF fanboards. Antimatter 14:52, 2 June 2011 (EDT)
- It's used quite a lot, though it's usually "CHUG". --FFN 13:44, 2 June 2011 (EDT)
- I see it used a lot, otherwise I wouldn't have created it.--MistaTee 13:37, 2 June 2011 (EDT)
