Talk:Bluster: Difference between revisions
From MediaWiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
Doesn't this character's name and, basically, his entire existence as a separate entity from Blaster qualify as [[authorial intent]]? Or no, not even "intent", but moreso "after the fact declaration".--[[User:Nevermore|Nevermore]] 05:30, 13 August 2012 (EDT) | Doesn't this character's name and, basically, his entire existence as a separate entity from Blaster qualify as [[authorial intent]]? Or no, not even "intent", but moreso "after the fact declaration".--[[User:Nevermore|Nevermore]] 05:30, 13 August 2012 (EDT) | ||
:I wouldn't even go so far as to call a joke made in response to a continuity error a "declaration." --[[User:KilMichaelMcC|KilMichaelMcC]] 09:06, 13 August 2012 (EDT) | :I wouldn't even go so far as to call a joke made in response to a continuity error a "declaration." --[[User:KilMichaelMcC|KilMichaelMcC]] 09:06, 13 August 2012 (EDT) | ||
::I think probably if we can accept stuff written about the G1 cartoon in an Ask Vector Prime written in a secret code language in a book about Animated, this isn't overstepping our established editorial reach. -[[User:LV|LV]] 09:55, 13 August 2012 (EDT) | |||
Revision as of 13:55, 13 August 2012
Hmm
Doesn't this character's name and, basically, his entire existence as a separate entity from Blaster qualify as authorial intent? Or no, not even "intent", but moreso "after the fact declaration".--Nevermore 05:30, 13 August 2012 (EDT)
- I wouldn't even go so far as to call a joke made in response to a continuity error a "declaration." --KilMichaelMcC 09:06, 13 August 2012 (EDT)
- I think probably if we can accept stuff written about the G1 cartoon in an Ask Vector Prime written in a secret code language in a book about Animated, this isn't overstepping our established editorial reach. -LV 09:55, 13 August 2012 (EDT)
