Talk:Matt Kuphaldt: Difference between revisions
From MediaWiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
Flicky1991 (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
|||
| Line 7: | Line 7: | ||
::For the record, a quick google search heavily points towards "wobbler" being correct. I'll watch the sketch myself when I'm able to. --[[User:Flicky1991|flicky]][[User talk:Flicky1991|1991]] 07:31, 14 February 2013 (EST) | ::For the record, a quick google search heavily points towards "wobbler" being correct. I'll watch the sketch myself when I'm able to. --[[User:Flicky1991|flicky]][[User talk:Flicky1991|1991]] 07:31, 14 February 2013 (EST) | ||
:::No, a quick Google search points heavily to people thinking "wobbler" is correct. Not to mention that this is a FOUR YEAR OLD thread you are replying to. --[[User:Khajidha|Khajidha]] 07:52, 14 February 2013 (EST) | |||
Revision as of 12:52, 14 February 2013
....e-surance what? - Jackpot 06:24, 29 March 2008 (UTC)
...I know it's a page about you and all...
...but the Monty Python bit is "Throatwarbler Mangrove."--RosicrucianTalk 21:23, 24 March 2009 (EDT)
- I didn't realize I was actually getting into an edit war - I'd thought that "warbler" was my own misspelling, so I believed I was correcting myself. At any rate, it sure SOUNDS like "wobbler," but I don't have a script I can check, and since both you and Interrobang agree otherwise... whatevs. It super doesn't matter to me. - Jackpot 21:49, 24 April 2009 (EDT)
- For the record, a quick google search heavily points towards "wobbler" being correct. I'll watch the sketch myself when I'm able to. --flicky1991 07:31, 14 February 2013 (EST)
- No, a quick Google search points heavily to people thinking "wobbler" is correct. Not to mention that this is a FOUR YEAR OLD thread you are replying to. --Khajidha 07:52, 14 February 2013 (EST)
- For the record, a quick google search heavily points towards "wobbler" being correct. I'll watch the sketch myself when I'm able to. --flicky1991 07:31, 14 February 2013 (EST)
