Talk:Trukk not munky: Difference between revisions
From MediaWiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
Interrobang (talk | contribs) |
Deceptitran (talk | contribs) |
||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
Does it really make sense to have [[Geewun]] redirect here, considering there's no actual mention of "Geewun" on the page? --[[User:Andrusi|Andrusi]] 03:02, 24 October 2006 (UTC) | Does it really make sense to have [[Geewun]] redirect here, considering there's no actual mention of "Geewun" on the page? --[[User:Andrusi|Andrusi]] 03:02, 24 October 2006 (UTC) | ||
: I agree. It's gone. Also, I don't think there should be a real GeeWun page until the term has existed for more than a year. Y'know, make sure it has more long-lasting relevance. --[[User:ItsWalky|ItsWalky]] 03:57, 24 October 2006 (UTC) | : I agree. It's gone. Also, I don't think there should be a real GeeWun page until the term has existed for more than a year. Y'know, make sure it has more long-lasting relevance. --[[User:ItsWalky|ItsWalky]] 03:57, 24 October 2006 (UTC) | ||
Revision as of 02:12, 25 March 2009
Should there be any mention of the 'Munky Not Trukk' variation?
- I don't think so. I've not really seen it used other than very seldomly as an ironic inversion of the original phrase. --ItsWalky 00:32, 23 September 2006 (UTC)
Does it really make sense to have Geewun redirect here, considering there's no actual mention of "Geewun" on the page? --Andrusi 03:02, 24 October 2006 (UTC)
- I agree. It's gone. Also, I don't think there should be a real GeeWun page until the term has existed for more than a year. Y'know, make sure it has more long-lasting relevance. --ItsWalky 03:57, 24 October 2006 (UTC)

