User talk:Pat: Difference between revisions
→Excessive snark and review-style writing: new section |
|||
| Line 38: | Line 38: | ||
Please read our [[Help:New Pages|New Pages help article]]. We'd rather have no article than a some brief sentences and a stub template. At the very least, a new article should also have a continuity identifier and a (potentially stubbed) fiction section, and be properly categorized. Thank you. [[User:Jalaguy|Jalaguy]] ([[User talk:Jalaguy|talk]]) 07:51, 13 February 2015 (EST) | Please read our [[Help:New Pages|New Pages help article]]. We'd rather have no article than a some brief sentences and a stub template. At the very least, a new article should also have a continuity identifier and a (potentially stubbed) fiction section, and be properly categorized. Thank you. [[User:Jalaguy|Jalaguy]] ([[User talk:Jalaguy|talk]]) 07:51, 13 February 2015 (EST) | ||
:Alright. | :Alright. | ||
== Excessive snark and review-style writing == | |||
Stop adding review-like notes and opinions to the toy articles ("however his double colour tone makes him somewhat weird and odd"), and you ''really'' need to cut down on the snark. Additionally... | |||
{{correctenglish}} | |||
Please. --[[User:Inkblot|Inkblot]] ([[User talk:Inkblot|talk]]) 03:36, 21 February 2015 (EST) | |||
Revision as of 08:36, 21 February 2015
But...
Also, stop adding redundant snark to articles that already made their point, like on Payload and Lockdown. --Inkblot (talk) 07:58, 7 January 2015 (EST)
Seriously...
Cut it out. --Inkblot (talk) 07:59, 7 January 2015 (EST)
Strike three...
...time out. Please stop adding unnecessary fluff and replacing captions. Your contributions to this wiki just haven't been up to standards, so DO read the articles in that welcome template above to get an idea of how we do things around here. Thank you. --Inkblot (talk) 09:14, 8 January 2015 (EST)
Dear Inkblot
Alright, so does that mean i can't do anything anymore?
Thanks
Captions
You're overdoing them. Fairly minor edits do not equal multiple captions. Additionally, to quote the Project: Captions page:
"Having no caption is better than having an outright dumb, inane, pointless, badly-written or unfunny one."
...And "hurr durr i r sukky playskul toy" is... neither particularly clever nor funny. --Inkblot (talk) 08:41, 17 January 2015 (EST)
About captions
Do i need your permission for adding captions?
- We have posted the answer to your question three times on this page. It's even highlighted in a blue box with a little picture. --ItsWalky (talk) 13:16, 17 January 2015 (EST)
Creating articles
Please read our New Pages help article. We'd rather have no article than a some brief sentences and a stub template. At the very least, a new article should also have a continuity identifier and a (potentially stubbed) fiction section, and be properly categorized. Thank you. Jalaguy (talk) 07:51, 13 February 2015 (EST)
- Alright.
Excessive snark and review-style writing
Stop adding review-like notes and opinions to the toy articles ("however his double colour tone makes him somewhat weird and odd"), and you really need to cut down on the snark. Additionally...




