Category talk:Mini-Cons: Difference between revisions
From MediaWiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
No edit summary |
Deceptitran (talk | contribs) |
||
| Line 7: | Line 7: | ||
:Might be better as a single article than a category, or even just as a section in the Mini-Con article. --[[User:KilMichaelMcC|KilMichaelMcC]] 18:53, 12 June 2008 (UTC) | :Might be better as a single article than a category, or even just as a section in the Mini-Con article. --[[User:KilMichaelMcC|KilMichaelMcC]] 18:53, 12 June 2008 (UTC) | ||
::I was thinking more on the individual character pages- the category would serve as a nice reassurance that- "No, we' know this is a mini-con mold, but we assure you, it is ''not'' a Mini-Con." A lot of times that kind of detail seems not to migrate down to individual character pages. (And really, having identical trivia note on 20-30 pages seems kinda silly anyway. Of course- I'm not sure how many 'cots fit in this category.) -[[User:Derik|Derik]] 19:05, 12 June 2008 (UTC) | ::I was thinking more on the individual character pages- the category would serve as a nice reassurance that- "No, we' know this is a mini-con mold, but we assure you, it is ''not'' a Mini-Con." A lot of times that kind of detail seems not to migrate down to individual character pages. (And really, having identical trivia note on 20-30 pages seems kinda silly anyway. Of course- I'm not sure how many 'cots fit in this category.) -[[User:Derik|Derik]] 19:05, 12 June 2008 (UTC) | ||
Latest revision as of 03:12, 25 March 2009
Should we have the "Armada" "Energon" "Classics" etc Categories here? --M Sipher 10:35, 24 November 2006 (UTC)
- No, because those categories don't apply to every article in here. Putting them in Mini-Con would be okay, though. Interrobang 11:58, 24 November 2006 (UTC)
Things that are not Mini-cons
[edit]Can I suggest a 'thigns that are not Mini-Cons' category, to be used for toys that were either made usign Mini-con molds bet are not-themselves- supposed to be mini-cons (because you could confuse them...) or for things like Animated Lugnut, who apparently has a PX "uke" port, but is not (obviously) a mini-con. -Derik 18:50, 12 June 2008 (UTC)
- Might be better as a single article than a category, or even just as a section in the Mini-Con article. --KilMichaelMcC 18:53, 12 June 2008 (UTC)
- I was thinking more on the individual character pages- the category would serve as a nice reassurance that- "No, we' know this is a mini-con mold, but we assure you, it is not a Mini-Con." A lot of times that kind of detail seems not to migrate down to individual character pages. (And really, having identical trivia note on 20-30 pages seems kinda silly anyway. Of course- I'm not sure how many 'cots fit in this category.) -Derik 19:05, 12 June 2008 (UTC)
