Talk:Catilla (DOTM): Difference between revisions
From MediaWiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
No edit summary |
Primestar3 (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
| Line 13: | Line 13: | ||
:::::::::I'm for keeping one article, but really the continuity note should say he's BOTH a movieverse and a UT character, not the current thing that claims he's only a UT guy, with a paranthetical "via" referencing his origin in a movie toyline. Which isn't even particularly accurate, since if he's UT "via" anything, it's "via Ask Vector Prime". --[[User:KilMichaelMcC|KilMichaelMcC]] ([[User talk:KilMichaelMcC|talk]]) 19:40, 27 August 2015 (EDT) | :::::::::I'm for keeping one article, but really the continuity note should say he's BOTH a movieverse and a UT character, not the current thing that claims he's only a UT guy, with a paranthetical "via" referencing his origin in a movie toyline. Which isn't even particularly accurate, since if he's UT "via" anything, it's "via Ask Vector Prime". --[[User:KilMichaelMcC|KilMichaelMcC]] ([[User talk:KilMichaelMcC|talk]]) 19:40, 27 August 2015 (EDT) | ||
::::::::::I'm all for 1) keeping a single article and 2) making that continuity header less goddamn stupid. --[[User:M Sipher|M Sipher]] ([[User talk:M Sipher|talk]]) 22:10, 27 August 2015 (EDT) | ::::::::::I'm all for 1) keeping a single article and 2) making that continuity header less goddamn stupid. --[[User:M Sipher|M Sipher]] ([[User talk:M Sipher|talk]]) 22:10, 27 August 2015 (EDT) | ||
:::::::::::I changed my opinion, since there's no other Mini-Con named Catilla, Vector Prime apparently retconned this character to be a Unicron Trilogy guy.--[[User:Primestar3|Primestar3]] ([[User talk:Primestar3|talk]]) 13:57, 28 August 2015 (EDT) | |||
Revision as of 17:57, 28 August 2015
Should we make a note of that awful pun in his bio? ZTS is Very Sorry 14:58, 25 August 2013 (EDT)
- I think people understood the pun. The disambiguation tag to the Pretender Catilla is right above the bio. --Inkblot 22:24, 25 August 2013 (EDT)
Catilla is an Maximal-allied Mini-Con from the Fire in the Dark portion of the Unicron Trilogy continuity family (via the Dark of the Moon toyline).
- lol wiki -LV (talk) 00:23, 14 August 2015 (EDT)
- Love it. Ascendron (talk) 02:07, 14 August 2015 (EDT)
- Er, yeah, gonna agree with LV! on this one. The intent seems to be making it an Armada version of this guy, since there's several Classics Mini-Con firmly in G1 that have Armada versions in the post. Escargon (talk) 16:44, 27 August 2015 (EDT)
- You mean we should create a separate page for the Aurex version or else make this page cover two continuity families? S.H.I.E.L.D. Agent 47 (talk) 16:51, 27 August 2015 (EDT)
- I'd go for separating, myself. Escargon (talk) 16:52, 27 August 2015 (EDT)
- We don't need two articles for the amount of fiction it has. Notes can cover anything that needs saying about him. --Giggidy (talk) 17:13, 27 August 2015 (EDT)
- I'd rather have two articles than something claiming that this was meant to be an Armada guy but was in the movie toyline. I think it's mostly okay with the Beast Wars guys to have there stuff still on their article, but this is kinda stand-out as something that probably shouldn't be done. Escargon (talk) 17:16, 27 August 2015 (EDT)
- Isn't Catilla a Movie guy? I mean I think it would be better to seperate pages for Armada version and movie version.--Primestar3 (talk) 17:33, 27 August 2015 (EDT)
- I'm for keeping one article, but really the continuity note should say he's BOTH a movieverse and a UT character, not the current thing that claims he's only a UT guy, with a paranthetical "via" referencing his origin in a movie toyline. Which isn't even particularly accurate, since if he's UT "via" anything, it's "via Ask Vector Prime". --KilMichaelMcC (talk) 19:40, 27 August 2015 (EDT)
- I'm all for 1) keeping a single article and 2) making that continuity header less goddamn stupid. --M Sipher (talk) 22:10, 27 August 2015 (EDT)
- I changed my opinion, since there's no other Mini-Con named Catilla, Vector Prime apparently retconned this character to be a Unicron Trilogy guy.--Primestar3 (talk) 13:57, 28 August 2015 (EDT)
- I'm all for 1) keeping a single article and 2) making that continuity header less goddamn stupid. --M Sipher (talk) 22:10, 27 August 2015 (EDT)
- I'm for keeping one article, but really the continuity note should say he's BOTH a movieverse and a UT character, not the current thing that claims he's only a UT guy, with a paranthetical "via" referencing his origin in a movie toyline. Which isn't even particularly accurate, since if he's UT "via" anything, it's "via Ask Vector Prime". --KilMichaelMcC (talk) 19:40, 27 August 2015 (EDT)
- Isn't Catilla a Movie guy? I mean I think it would be better to seperate pages for Armada version and movie version.--Primestar3 (talk) 17:33, 27 August 2015 (EDT)
- I'd rather have two articles than something claiming that this was meant to be an Armada guy but was in the movie toyline. I think it's mostly okay with the Beast Wars guys to have there stuff still on their article, but this is kinda stand-out as something that probably shouldn't be done. Escargon (talk) 17:16, 27 August 2015 (EDT)
- We don't need two articles for the amount of fiction it has. Notes can cover anything that needs saying about him. --Giggidy (talk) 17:13, 27 August 2015 (EDT)
- I'd go for separating, myself. Escargon (talk) 16:52, 27 August 2015 (EDT)
- You mean we should create a separate page for the Aurex version or else make this page cover two continuity families? S.H.I.E.L.D. Agent 47 (talk) 16:51, 27 August 2015 (EDT)
- Er, yeah, gonna agree with LV! on this one. The intent seems to be making it an Armada version of this guy, since there's several Classics Mini-Con firmly in G1 that have Armada versions in the post. Escargon (talk) 16:44, 27 August 2015 (EDT)
- Love it. Ascendron (talk) 02:07, 14 August 2015 (EDT)
