Talk:Archforce: Difference between revisions
From MediaWiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
Created page with "Can we please fix up this article so that it doesn't give a ridiculous amount of priority to a retcon made 26 years after the fact and an unnamed noncharacter who only shows u..." |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
Can we please fix up this article so that it doesn't give a ridiculous amount of priority to a retcon made 26 years after the fact and an unnamed noncharacter who only shows up for one flashback? I don't care that hapless trooper is merged here, but that stuff needs to stay in the fiction section. [[User:Saix|Saix]] ([[User talk:Saix|talk]]) 15:20, 6 January 2016 (EST) | Can we please fix up this article so that it doesn't give a ridiculous amount of priority to a retcon made 26 years after the fact and an unnamed noncharacter who only shows up for one flashback? I don't care that hapless trooper is merged here, but that stuff needs to stay in the fiction section. [[User:Saix|Saix]] ([[User talk:Saix|talk]]) 15:20, 6 January 2016 (EST) | ||
:I think we should at least take the name "Archforce" out of the Marvel section, but that's part of a larger proposal of mine that I really need to get around to putting on the Community Portal. I guess the Re-Birth stuff ''could'' be taken out of the opening, but I don't know that it's necessary. --[[User:Riptide|Riptide]] ([[User talk:Riptide|talk]]) 15:32, 6 January 2016 (EST) | |||
Revision as of 20:32, 6 January 2016
Can we please fix up this article so that it doesn't give a ridiculous amount of priority to a retcon made 26 years after the fact and an unnamed noncharacter who only shows up for one flashback? I don't care that hapless trooper is merged here, but that stuff needs to stay in the fiction section. Saix (talk) 15:20, 6 January 2016 (EST)
- I think we should at least take the name "Archforce" out of the Marvel section, but that's part of a larger proposal of mine that I really need to get around to putting on the Community Portal. I guess the Re-Birth stuff could be taken out of the opening, but I don't know that it's necessary. --Riptide (talk) 15:32, 6 January 2016 (EST)
