Talk:Combiner: Difference between revisions
From MediaWiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
Personally, I am inclined to say that this article is not an appropriate place to make a list of combining toys. Arguably there is ''no'' appropriate place for that, since we already have a combiners category. Does anybody else want to chime in? I don't want to just revert Evil-yuusha's work without at least making sure I'm not alone on it. --[[User:Steve-o|Steve-o]] 05:34, 21 February 2007 (UTC) | Personally, I am inclined to say that this article is not an appropriate place to make a list of combining toys. Arguably there is ''no'' appropriate place for that, since we already have a combiners category. Does anybody else want to chime in? I don't want to just revert Evil-yuusha's work without at least making sure I'm not alone on it. --[[User:Steve-o|Steve-o]] 05:34, 21 February 2007 (UTC) | ||
:I like the article as it is. Yes, there's a combiners category, but I think having an article with a list of combiners that's further broken down by method of combination is cool, too. --[[User:KilMichaelMcC|KilMichaelMcC]] 05:50, 21 February 2007 (UTC)<div id="wikia-credits"><br /><br /><small>From [http://transformers.wikia.com Teletraan I: The Transformers Wiki], a [http://www.wikia.com Wikia] wiki.</small></div> | :I like the article as it is. Yes, there's a combiners category, but I think having an article with a list of combiners that's further broken down by method of combination is cool, too. --[[User:KilMichaelMcC|KilMichaelMcC]] 05:50, 21 February 2007 (UTC) | ||
::I'm gonna have to agree, primarily on the basis that it's not just a simple list; the combiners are broken down into type, and the various types explained and detailed. - [[User:Dark T Zeratul|Dark T Zeratul]] 08:09, 21 February 2007 (UTC)<div id="wikia-credits"><br /><br /><small>From [http://transformers.wikia.com Teletraan I: The Transformers Wiki], a [http://www.wikia.com Wikia] wiki.</small></div> | |||
Revision as of 08:09, 21 February 2007
Personally, I am inclined to say that this article is not an appropriate place to make a list of combining toys. Arguably there is no appropriate place for that, since we already have a combiners category. Does anybody else want to chime in? I don't want to just revert Evil-yuusha's work without at least making sure I'm not alone on it. --Steve-o 05:34, 21 February 2007 (UTC)
- I like the article as it is. Yes, there's a combiners category, but I think having an article with a list of combiners that's further broken down by method of combination is cool, too. --KilMichaelMcC 05:50, 21 February 2007 (UTC)
- I'm gonna have to agree, primarily on the basis that it's not just a simple list; the combiners are broken down into type, and the various types explained and detailed. - Dark T Zeratul 08:09, 21 February 2007 (UTC)
