Talk:Dinobot (RID): Difference between revisions
From MediaWiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
:This subspecies didn't even exist when Miko and Bulkhead made that reference. --[[User:Sabrblade|Sabrblade]] ([[User talk:Sabrblade|talk]]) 11:04, 12 August 2016 (EDT) | :This subspecies didn't even exist when Miko and Bulkhead made that reference. --[[User:Sabrblade|Sabrblade]] ([[User talk:Sabrblade|talk]]) 11:04, 12 August 2016 (EDT) | ||
::(Rolls eyes) yes, but considering the broadstrokes prime had in the aligned universe, we can't exactly trust it to connect to the previous or comic. Heck considering it was just a passing reference, one could argue there is no proof they were referring to the FOC version of the dinobots at all, it might've been a mythology gag.--[[User:Projectus|Projectus]] ([[User talk:Projectus|talk]]) 17:09, 12 August 2016 (EDT) | ::(Rolls eyes) yes, but considering the broadstrokes prime had in the aligned universe, we can't exactly trust it to connect to the previous or comic. Heck considering it was just a passing reference, one could argue there is no proof they were referring to the FOC version of the dinobots at all, it might've been a mythology gag.--[[User:Projectus|Projectus]] ([[User talk:Projectus|talk]]) 17:09, 12 August 2016 (EDT) | ||
:::Do you have any evidence that the ''Prime'' cartoon reference should go on this page? [[User:S.H.I.E.L.D. Agent 47|S.H.I.E.L.D. Agent 47]] ([[User talk:S.H.I.E.L.D. Agent 47|talk]]) 17:10, 12 August 2016 (EDT) | :::Do you have any evidence that the ''Prime'' cartoon reference should go on this page at all? [[User:S.H.I.E.L.D. Agent 47|S.H.I.E.L.D. Agent 47]] ([[User talk:S.H.I.E.L.D. Agent 47|talk]]) 17:10, 12 August 2016 (EDT) | ||
Revision as of 21:13, 12 August 2016
Does this need the 2015 in the paranthetical? I don't remember there being any Dinobots in RID 2001. --abates (talk) 04:13, 12 August 2016 (EDT)
Why does someone keep deleting the prime cartoon page, is there any proof that bulkhead wasn't talking about this subspecies of transformers?--Projectus (talk) 10:22, 12 August 2016 (EDT)
- This subspecies didn't even exist when Miko and Bulkhead made that reference. --Sabrblade (talk) 11:04, 12 August 2016 (EDT)
- (Rolls eyes) yes, but considering the broadstrokes prime had in the aligned universe, we can't exactly trust it to connect to the previous or comic. Heck considering it was just a passing reference, one could argue there is no proof they were referring to the FOC version of the dinobots at all, it might've been a mythology gag.--Projectus (talk) 17:09, 12 August 2016 (EDT)
- Do you have any evidence that the Prime cartoon reference should go on this page at all? S.H.I.E.L.D. Agent 47 (talk) 17:10, 12 August 2016 (EDT)
- (Rolls eyes) yes, but considering the broadstrokes prime had in the aligned universe, we can't exactly trust it to connect to the previous or comic. Heck considering it was just a passing reference, one could argue there is no proof they were referring to the FOC version of the dinobots at all, it might've been a mythology gag.--Projectus (talk) 17:09, 12 August 2016 (EDT)
