User talk:M Sipher/Sandbox:ToysBullets: Difference between revisions
From MediaWiki
Jump to navigationJump to search Created page with "Debating this. On the one hand, most characters don't faction-jump much. On the other, some really, really do. Maybe not as much as poor Blackarachnia, but still. On the other..." |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
Debating this. On the one hand, most characters don't faction-jump much. On the other, some really, really do. Maybe not as much as poor Blackarachnia, but still. On the other, visual continuity is neat. --[[User:M Sipher|M Sipher]] ([[User talk:M Sipher|talk]]) 14:06, 28 December 2016 (EST) | Debating this. On the one hand, most characters don't faction-jump much. On the other, some really, really do. Maybe not as much as poor Blackarachnia, but still. On the other, visual continuity is neat. --[[User:M Sipher|M Sipher]] ([[User talk:M Sipher|talk]]) 14:06, 28 December 2016 (EST) | ||
:This WOULD also give us an incentive to go back and do a lil work on a lotta toy pages. There's a ton whose various entries could certainly use some beefing, pruning, link-fixing, image-work (reworking what's there if not adding new ones), etc. But this would be one HELL of a tall order so it's not exactly a priority. There are still plenty of toyline pages needing reworking with the new bullets and layouts first. --[[User:M Sipher|M Sipher]] ([[User talk:M Sipher|talk]]) 14:19, 28 December 2016 (EST) | |||
Latest revision as of 19:19, 28 December 2016
Debating this. On the one hand, most characters don't faction-jump much. On the other, some really, really do. Maybe not as much as poor Blackarachnia, but still. On the other, visual continuity is neat. --M Sipher (talk) 14:06, 28 December 2016 (EST)
- This WOULD also give us an incentive to go back and do a lil work on a lotta toy pages. There's a ton whose various entries could certainly use some beefing, pruning, link-fixing, image-work (reworking what's there if not adding new ones), etc. But this would be one HELL of a tall order so it's not exactly a priority. There are still plenty of toyline pages needing reworking with the new bullets and layouts first. --M Sipher (talk) 14:19, 28 December 2016 (EST)
