Talk:First Strike issue 2: Difference between revisions

From MediaWiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
Outlinks to IHW?: new section
 
No edit summary
 
Line 2: Line 2:


Would anyone be opposed to simply outlinking characters like the Solstar Knights considering they haven't actually done anything in the main action of the book? --[[User:DannyBoy|DannyBoy]] ([[User talk:DannyBoy|talk]]) 12:10, 25 August 2017 (EDT)
Would anyone be opposed to simply outlinking characters like the Solstar Knights considering they haven't actually done anything in the main action of the book? --[[User:DannyBoy|DannyBoy]] ([[User talk:DannyBoy|talk]]) 12:10, 25 August 2017 (EDT)
:Hmm. If and until they do anything of significance in the next issue, I suppose that is reasonable. [[User:S.H.I.E.L.D. Agent 47|S.H.I.E.L.D. Agent 47]] ([[User talk:S.H.I.E.L.D. Agent 47|talk]]) 12:13, 25 August 2017 (EDT)
On a related topic, what about the Dreadnoks? We don't have pages for each individual Dreadnok on the TFWiki. What if we linked individual Dreadnok names to the IDW Hasbro Wiki (well, I guess we have to make the Dreadnoks articles there first)? [[User:S.H.I.E.L.D. Agent 47|S.H.I.E.L.D. Agent 47]] ([[User talk:S.H.I.E.L.D. Agent 47|talk]]) 12:13, 25 August 2017 (EDT)

Latest revision as of 16:13, 25 August 2017

[edit]

Would anyone be opposed to simply outlinking characters like the Solstar Knights considering they haven't actually done anything in the main action of the book? --DannyBoy (talk) 12:10, 25 August 2017 (EDT)

Hmm. If and until they do anything of significance in the next issue, I suppose that is reasonable. S.H.I.E.L.D. Agent 47 (talk) 12:13, 25 August 2017 (EDT)

On a related topic, what about the Dreadnoks? We don't have pages for each individual Dreadnok on the TFWiki. What if we linked individual Dreadnok names to the IDW Hasbro Wiki (well, I guess we have to make the Dreadnoks articles there first)? S.H.I.E.L.D. Agent 47 (talk) 12:13, 25 August 2017 (EDT)