Talk:Collision Course: Difference between revisions
From MediaWiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
Cyberlink420 (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
Since the subtitle may be auto generated, they should not count as errors (because there are too many to be listed)?--[[User:Kmc|Kmc]] ([[User talk:Kmc|talk]]) 21:27, 19 June 2018 (EDT) | Since the subtitle may be auto generated, they should not count as errors (because there are too many to be listed)?--[[User:Kmc|Kmc]] ([[User talk:Kmc|talk]]) 21:27, 19 June 2018 (EDT) | ||
:I'm not sure they are auto-generated. There's several proper names like Grimlock and Megatronus that appear just fine in the captions multiple times, which I don't think an autocaption would pick up on. Maybe the use an autogenerated caption as a base and refine it afterwards, but neglected to change several errors? -- [[User:Cyberlink420|Cyberlink420]] ([[User talk:Cyberlink420|talk]]) 00:07, 20 June 2018 (EDT) | :I'm not sure they are auto-generated. There's several proper names like Grimlock and Megatronus that appear just fine in the captions multiple times, which I don't think an autocaption would pick up on. Maybe the use an autogenerated caption as a base and refine it afterwards, but neglected to change several errors? -- [[User:Cyberlink420|Cyberlink420]] ([[User talk:Cyberlink420|talk]]) 00:07, 20 June 2018 (EDT) | ||
::It's possible to set auto-captioning software to recognize unusual words like Grimlock and Megatron. But considering the amount of errors in even professional captions ("Chugway"), I don't think noting every single wrong thing is particularly useful here. [[User:Saix|Saix]] ([[User talk:Saix|talk]]) 00:32, 20 June 2018 (EDT) | |||
Revision as of 04:32, 20 June 2018
Since the subtitle may be auto generated, they should not count as errors (because there are too many to be listed)?--Kmc (talk) 21:27, 19 June 2018 (EDT)
- I'm not sure they are auto-generated. There's several proper names like Grimlock and Megatronus that appear just fine in the captions multiple times, which I don't think an autocaption would pick up on. Maybe the use an autogenerated caption as a base and refine it afterwards, but neglected to change several errors? -- Cyberlink420 (talk) 00:07, 20 June 2018 (EDT)
