Talk:Conehead: Difference between revisions

From MediaWiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
Khajidha (talk | contribs)
→Capitalization: new section
Magaroja (talk | contribs)
→Seeker(s) Elite?: new section
Line 6: Line 6:


Should the term be captitalized or not? Both are used in the article. --[[User:Khajidha|Khajidha]] ([[User talk:Khajidha|talk]]) 10:15, 27 November 2015 (EST)
Should the term be captitalized or not? Both are used in the article. --[[User:Khajidha|Khajidha]] ([[User talk:Khajidha|talk]]) 10:15, 27 November 2015 (EST)
== ''Seeker(s) Elite''? ==
Given the previous Henkei/Gentei set and now the Earthrise 2-pack, should we consider moving these guys to the "more formal" Seeker(s) Elite? The description for the Earthrise set on the Amazon page even refers to the three Coneheads as the "Seeker Elite trio". At the very least, we might want to think about including the term in the opening paragraph (and in the corresponding Seeker page, too). [[User:Magaroja|Doc Chloroplast]] ([[User talk:Magaroja|talk]]) 10:31, 26 August 2020 (EDT)

Revision as of 14:31, 26 August 2020

Is Ramjet really a real word? --Detour 23:36, 21 December 2007 (UTC)

Google, mofo, do you have it? --ItsWalky 23:37, 21 December 2007 (UTC)
Ayup. - Chris McFeely 23:38, 21 December 2007 (UTC)

Capitalization

Should the term be captitalized or not? Both are used in the article. --Khajidha (talk) 10:15, 27 November 2015 (EST)

Seeker(s) Elite?

Given the previous Henkei/Gentei set and now the Earthrise 2-pack, should we consider moving these guys to the "more formal" Seeker(s) Elite? The description for the Earthrise set on the Amazon page even refers to the three Coneheads as the "Seeker Elite trio". At the very least, we might want to think about including the term in the opening paragraph (and in the corresponding Seeker page, too). Doc Chloroplast (talk) 10:31, 26 August 2020 (EDT)