Talk:Transformers: The Ultimate Guide: Difference between revisions
From MediaWiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
mNo edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
:Bit o' digging dug [http://groups.google.co.uk/group/alt.toys.transformers/msg/5ce0bb3b94e7f91f?&hl=en&q=furman+auto+assembly+book+panel this up]. And I quote: | :Bit o' digging dug [http://groups.google.co.uk/group/alt.toys.transformers/msg/5ce0bb3b94e7f91f?&hl=en&q=furman+auto+assembly+book+panel this up]. And I quote: | ||
::"We realized it would look bad by the time the book came out not to have an Energon section. So we had to scale back a few sections. Robots in Disguise lost its TV section which is a shame because it would have been nice just to have that for completists sake, you know we've got a TV section on pretty much everything." | ::"We realized it would look bad by the time the book came out not to have an Energon section. So we had to scale back a few sections. Robots in Disguise lost its TV section which is a shame because it would have been nice just to have that for completists sake, you know we've got a TV section on pretty much everything." | ||
:Bah. - [[User:Chris McFeely|Chris McFeely]] 18:28, 21 August 2007 (UTC)<div id="wikia-credits"><br /><br /><small>From [http://transformers.wikia.com Teletraan I: The Transformers Wiki], a [http://www.wikia.com Wikia] wiki.</small></div> | :Bah. - [[User:Chris McFeely|Chris McFeely]] 18:28, 21 August 2007 (UTC) | ||
:::Thank you. That burns, but I was asking for it. --[[User:Thylacine 2000|Thylacine 2000]] 18:52, 21 August 2007 (UTC)<div id="wikia-credits"><br /><br /><small>From [http://transformers.wikia.com Teletraan I: The Transformers Wiki], a [http://www.wikia.com Wikia] wiki.</small></div> | |||
Revision as of 18:52, 21 August 2007
Excluding RID stories
The info about Saban and Disney is all correct. However, I recall that convention reports from Auto Assembly, posted to ATT and Allspark, reported Furman saying he would have cut RID anyway--either because he didn't like it, or because assorted short stuff had to be pruned to allow more room for the then-upcoming Energon, or both. Can anyone clear that up?--Thylacine 2000 18:01, 21 August 2007 (UTC)
- Bit o' digging dug this up. And I quote:
- "We realized it would look bad by the time the book came out not to have an Energon section. So we had to scale back a few sections. Robots in Disguise lost its TV section which is a shame because it would have been nice just to have that for completists sake, you know we've got a TV section on pretty much everything."
- Bah. - Chris McFeely 18:28, 21 August 2007 (UTC)
- Thank you. That burns, but I was asking for it. --Thylacine 2000 18:52, 21 August 2007 (UTC)
