User talk:LadiesMan217: Difference between revisions

From MediaWiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
← Older editNewer edit →
undoCyberlink420 (talk | contribs)
Administrators
55,156 edits
Deceptitran (talk | contribs)
Bots
47,324 edits
→Captions: new section
Line 6: Line 6:
Please do NOT make such drastic changes to pages without discussing them first.  We have already decided not to use infoboxes. --[[User:Sntint|Sntint]] 09:45, 12 August 2007 (UTC)
Please do NOT make such drastic changes to pages without discussing them first.  We have already decided not to use infoboxes. --[[User:Sntint|Sntint]] 09:45, 12 August 2007 (UTC)
:Yes, it's a particular mess if you pour so much information into a template that [[:category:things that don't exist|doesn't exist]].--[[User:Rosicrucian|Rosicrucian]] 17:14, 3 September 2007 (UTC)
:Yes, it's a particular mess if you pour so much information into a template that [[:category:things that don't exist|doesn't exist]].--[[User:Rosicrucian|Rosicrucian]] 17:14, 3 September 2007 (UTC)
== Captions ==
{{captionhappy}}
Please find better things to do with your time than adding jokes, especially if you're going to remove other people's, which is frowned upon except in cases of offensive jokes. -- [[User:Cyberlink420|Cyberlink420]] ([[User talk:Cyberlink420|talk]]) 21:02, 13 October 2022 (EDT)

Revision as of 01:02, 14 October 2022

"No doubt our wit is too slyly subtle for them to appreciate."
"No doubt our wit is too slyly subtle for them to appreciate."
"Apparently, some of your kind saw fit to decorate me while I was waiting."

If you haven't yet contributed anything, we'd really rather you didn't simply change jokes or add new ones without adding actual content. This also holds true for removing captions whole-hog or replacing them with "information" that really isn't.
Remember, we're meant to be informative first, funny second. Write an episode summary, check out the Most Wanted Pages list or the Stubs list.
For further information, see: Project:Captions

I would think after the third or fourth time you found humorous captions to remove, maybe you should have thought to yourself... "hey, maybe these are supposed to be here!" --ItsWalky 14:39, 3 September 2007 (UTC)

Infoboxes

Please do NOT make such drastic changes to pages without discussing them first. We have already decided not to use infoboxes. --Sntint 09:45, 12 August 2007 (UTC)

Yes, it's a particular mess if you pour so much information into a template that doesn't exist.--Rosicrucian 17:14, 3 September 2007 (UTC)

Captions

"No doubt our wit is too slyly subtle for them to appreciate."
"No doubt our wit is too slyly subtle for them to appreciate."
"Apparently, some of your kind saw fit to decorate me while I was waiting."

If you haven't yet contributed anything, we'd really rather you didn't simply change jokes or add new ones without adding actual content. This also holds true for removing captions whole-hog or replacing them with "information" that really isn't.
Remember, we're meant to be informative first, funny second. Write an episode summary, check out the Most Wanted Pages list or the Stubs list.
For further information, see: Project:Captions

Please find better things to do with your time than adding jokes, especially if you're going to remove other people's, which is frowned upon except in cases of offensive jokes. -- Cyberlink420 (talk) 21:02, 13 October 2022 (EDT)

Retrieved from "https://tfwiki.duckdns.org/index.php?title=User_talk:LadiesMan217&oldid=1645767"