Talk:Powerplex: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
T9ol-Fun3e (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
Cyberlink420 (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
==The name== | ==The name== | ||
Didn’t Simon Furman declare this guy as Powerplex? [[User:T9ol-Fun3e|T9ol-Fun3e]] ([[User talk:T9ol-Fun3e|talk]]) 19:07, 8 October 2025 (EDT) | |||
:I mean he said [https://x.com/simonfurman3/status/1973651229189566613?s=46&t=aH4MhZqd9dJysoJQcQ4ttQ here] in this X post that in the instructions it featured Powerplex. [[User:T9ol-Fun3e|T9ol-Fun3e]] ([[User talk:T9ol-Fun3e|talk]]) 19:52, 8 October 2025 (EDT) | |||
:I might be wrong here, but weren't those instructions released on the day of the poll / event, meaning that this could have just been a provisory name? If so, I think it's better to wait for an official reveal tbh ([[User:FortressMaxxing|FortressMaxxing]] ([[User talk:FortressMaxxing|talk]]) 23:57, 8 October 2025 (EDT)) | |||
::Wait, nevermind, I just realized that the Powerplex name isn't in the instructions themselves, just the tweet. And I was about to say that maybe Furman just used the Powerplex name because it was his preferred out of the three, but... [https://news.tfw2005.com/2025/09/18/transformers-day-at-battersea-power-station-q-a-with-simon-furman-about-the-new-titan-546903 He actually previously said his favorite was Turbinus Maximus]: so yeah, it is probably pretty safe to say that the name is going to be Powerplex by this point. imho, with all of this being the case, I think we can treat his tweet as a de facto official reveal and rename the article. ([[User:FortressMaxxing|FortressMaxxing]] ([[User talk:FortressMaxxing|talk]]) 00:06, 9 October 2025 (EDT)) | |||
:::Is the nameless tag going to stay up or can it go down since it has a “name”? [[User:T9ol-Fun3e|T9ol-Fun3e]] ([[User talk:T9ol-Fun3e|talk]]) 12:43, 14 October 2025 (EDT) | |||
::::Done. -- [[User:Cyberlink420|Cyberlink420]] ([[User talk:Cyberlink420|talk]]) 13:10, 14 October 2025 (EDT) | |||
Revision as of 17:10, 14 October 2025
The name
Didn’t Simon Furman declare this guy as Powerplex? T9ol-Fun3e (talk) 19:07, 8 October 2025 (EDT)
- I mean he said here in this X post that in the instructions it featured Powerplex. T9ol-Fun3e (talk) 19:52, 8 October 2025 (EDT)
- I might be wrong here, but weren't those instructions released on the day of the poll / event, meaning that this could have just been a provisory name? If so, I think it's better to wait for an official reveal tbh (FortressMaxxing (talk) 23:57, 8 October 2025 (EDT))
- Wait, nevermind, I just realized that the Powerplex name isn't in the instructions themselves, just the tweet. And I was about to say that maybe Furman just used the Powerplex name because it was his preferred out of the three, but... He actually previously said his favorite was Turbinus Maximus: so yeah, it is probably pretty safe to say that the name is going to be Powerplex by this point. imho, with all of this being the case, I think we can treat his tweet as a de facto official reveal and rename the article. (FortressMaxxing (talk) 00:06, 9 October 2025 (EDT))
- Is the nameless tag going to stay up or can it go down since it has a “name”? T9ol-Fun3e (talk) 12:43, 14 October 2025 (EDT)
- Done. -- Cyberlink420 (talk) 13:10, 14 October 2025 (EDT)
- Is the nameless tag going to stay up or can it go down since it has a “name”? T9ol-Fun3e (talk) 12:43, 14 October 2025 (EDT)
- Wait, nevermind, I just realized that the Powerplex name isn't in the instructions themselves, just the tweet. And I was about to say that maybe Furman just used the Powerplex name because it was his preferred out of the three, but... He actually previously said his favorite was Turbinus Maximus: so yeah, it is probably pretty safe to say that the name is going to be Powerplex by this point. imho, with all of this being the case, I think we can treat his tweet as a de facto official reveal and rename the article. (FortressMaxxing (talk) 00:06, 9 October 2025 (EDT))