User talk:Cliffjumper prime: Difference between revisions
From MediaWiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{notareference}} | {{notareference}} | ||
apparantly unless you're Rosicrucian or Detour you can't post any interesting notes or jokes... so to all newcomers, don't bother posting ANYTHING unless it's a goddamn fact... leave the quirky stuff to the "professionals" | apparantly unless you're Rosicrucian or Detour you can't post any interesting notes or jokes... so to all newcomers, don't bother posting ANYTHING unless it's a goddamn fact... leave the quirky stuff to the "professionals" {{unsigned|Cliffjumper prime|2007-06-11 21:53}} | ||
:"I personally think this TF maybe sorta unintentionally might be like another TF." isn't an interesting note. | |||
:If Sideswipe looked/acted ''exactly'' like Drift, or it was shown somewhere in an official source that he was ''deliberately'' modeled on Drift (seeing as how there's no shortage of TFs that are swordsmen and/or determined warriors), ''that'' would be an interesting note. --[[User:Jeysie|Jeysie]] 22:11, 11 June 2009 (EDT) | |||
Revision as of 02:11, 12 June 2009
apparantly unless you're Rosicrucian or Detour you can't post any interesting notes or jokes... so to all newcomers, don't bother posting ANYTHING unless it's a goddamn fact... leave the quirky stuff to the "professionals" —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Cliffjumper prime (talk • contribs) 2007-06-11 21:53.
- "I personally think this TF maybe sorta unintentionally might be like another TF." isn't an interesting note.
- If Sideswipe looked/acted exactly like Drift, or it was shown somewhere in an official source that he was deliberately modeled on Drift (seeing as how there's no shortage of TFs that are swordsmen and/or determined warriors), that would be an interesting note. --Jeysie 22:11, 11 June 2009 (EDT)
