Category talk:Terrorcons: Difference between revisions

From MediaWiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
Jeysie (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Jeysie (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Line 4: Line 4:
:::Scorponok and Alpha Quintesson aren't drones. [[User:Interrobang|Interrobang]] 16:37, 2 October 2007 (UTC)
:::Scorponok and Alpha Quintesson aren't drones. [[User:Interrobang|Interrobang]] 16:37, 2 October 2007 (UTC)
::::Considering that we have SG Terrorcons now too... I'd be curious as to what the consensus here would be. --[[User:Jeysie|Jeysie]] 09:30, 7 August 2009 (EDT)
::::Considering that we have SG Terrorcons now too... I'd be curious as to what the consensus here would be. --[[User:Jeysie|Jeysie]] 09:30, 7 August 2009 (EDT)
::::So, er, any thoughts on the matter? --[[User:Jeysie|Jeysie]] 20:58, 20 September 2009 (EDT)

Revision as of 00:58, 21 September 2009

Is this category just for the Energon Terrorcons, or can the G1 Terrorcons be included? -- SFH 23:01, 28 September 2007 (UTC)

Going by the way to organized Category:Dinobots and Category:Predacons, I guess it can include both... although I agree that that is kind of confusing. --Steve-o 15:29, 2 October 2007 (UTC)
We could move the category to Category:Terrorcon Drones--Rosicrucian 16:23, 2 October 2007 (UTC)
Scorponok and Alpha Quintesson aren't drones. Interrobang 16:37, 2 October 2007 (UTC)
Considering that we have SG Terrorcons now too... I'd be curious as to what the consensus here would be. --Jeysie 09:30, 7 August 2009 (EDT)
So, er, any thoughts on the matter? --Jeysie 20:58, 20 September 2009 (EDT)