Talk:Comics: Difference between revisions
From MediaWiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
Deceptitran (talk | contribs) |
Bluestreak7 (talk | contribs) m dead link |
||
| Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
---- | ---- | ||
I've readded the publishers from the deleted | I've readded the publishers from the deleted "Other" page. There's no reason they should be on a separate page -- or, for that matter, on one called strictly "Other," which is an overly ambiguous name for anything. --[[User:ItsWalky|ItsWalky]] 17:35, 18 May 2006 (UTC) | ||
:It's all good. That "other" page was an artifact from the early days of this Wiki, when we didn't have much idea what the standards would be yet.--[[User:G.B. Blackrock|G.B. Blackrock]] 20:46, 18 May 2006 (UTC) | :It's all good. That "other" page was an artifact from the early days of this Wiki, when we didn't have much idea what the standards would be yet.--[[User:G.B. Blackrock|G.B. Blackrock]] 20:46, 18 May 2006 (UTC) | ||
Revision as of 17:34, 20 October 2009
Looking at the comics template, I was thinking that there should be something in there listing the TPB that each issue is available in. What does everyone think? --Bertson 17:21, 25 April 2006 (UTC)
- For now, I think it'd just be appropriate to mention if the issue was collected in any TPBs in the "Items of Note" section. --Suki Brits 00:21, 26 April 2006 (UTC)
I've readded the publishers from the deleted "Other" page. There's no reason they should be on a separate page -- or, for that matter, on one called strictly "Other," which is an overly ambiguous name for anything. --ItsWalky 17:35, 18 May 2006 (UTC)
- It's all good. That "other" page was an artifact from the early days of this Wiki, when we didn't have much idea what the standards would be yet.--G.B. Blackrock 20:46, 18 May 2006 (UTC)
