User talk:LesterX: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
|||
| Line 8: | Line 8: | ||
:Also, why would you upload the same image THREE times? --[[User:FFN|FFN]] 18:33, 3 November 2009 (EST) | :Also, why would you upload the same image THREE times? --[[User:FFN|FFN]] 18:33, 3 November 2009 (EST) | ||
::That cyber slammers front page picture is stupid! It does not represent Brawl well enough!--[[User:LesterX|LesterX]] 16:22, 4 November 2009 (EST) | ::That cyber slammers front page picture is stupid! It does not represent Brawl well enough!--[[User:LesterX|LesterX]] 16:22, 4 November 2009 (EST) | ||
==For future reference...== | |||
Appending trivia entries with "Idiots" is not a great idea. Okay, you thought it was a dumb move. Don't express your thoughts so crudely. Chances are, adding "Idiots" to the end of a pre-existing paragraph isn't going to improve it! --[[User:ItsWalky|ItsWalky]] 19:52, 10 November 2009 (EST) | |||
Revision as of 00:52, 11 November 2009
ROTF images
I'm sorry, but those ROTF images you uploaded are going to have be deleted. They're leaked images which have not been released by Hasbro or Dreamworks, and in accordance with our image policies, have to be deleted. -- SFH 20:12, 16 October 2009 (EDT)
Uh, what images? I don't remember... --LesterX 19:17, 25 October 2009 (EDT)
Brawl
We've had a long debate about this on the wiki, and we've decided not to use that concept image of Brawl, at least not for the foreseeable future. Also, please see our image policy page for details on what we expect of users when they upload images. Thanks. --FFN 18:30, 3 November 2009 (EST)
- Also, why would you upload the same image THREE times? --FFN 18:33, 3 November 2009 (EST)
- That cyber slammers front page picture is stupid! It does not represent Brawl well enough!--LesterX 16:22, 4 November 2009 (EST)
For future reference...
Appending trivia entries with "Idiots" is not a great idea. Okay, you thought it was a dumb move. Don't express your thoughts so crudely. Chances are, adding "Idiots" to the end of a pre-existing paragraph isn't going to improve it! --ItsWalky 19:52, 10 November 2009 (EST)
