Talk:NATO: Difference between revisions

From MediaWiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
Interrobang (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 2: Line 2:
:I think you may be taking the "only what is revealed in TF fiction" thing a little too far. While we shouldn't go into the real world history of NATO, I would think the name would be alright. [[User:Khajidha|Khajidha]] 19:37, 7 December 2009 (EST)
:I think you may be taking the "only what is revealed in TF fiction" thing a little too far. While we shouldn't go into the real world history of NATO, I would think the name would be alright. [[User:Khajidha|Khajidha]] 19:37, 7 December 2009 (EST)
::My question is relating to whether this page should be moved to "North Atlantic Treaty Organization", since we don't use acronyms when we don't have to. [[User:Interrobang|—Interrobang]] 22:39, 7 December 2009 (EST)
::My question is relating to whether this page should be moved to "North Atlantic Treaty Organization", since we don't use acronyms when we don't have to. [[User:Interrobang|—Interrobang]] 22:39, 7 December 2009 (EST)
:::Sorry, misunderstood. [[Special:Contributions/97.82.152.134|97.82.152.134]] 22:53, 7 December 2009 (EST)

Revision as of 03:53, 8 December 2009

Is it ever called "North Atlantic Treaty Organization" in full in any fiction? —Interrobang 17:40, 7 December 2009 (EST)

I think you may be taking the "only what is revealed in TF fiction" thing a little too far. While we shouldn't go into the real world history of NATO, I would think the name would be alright. Khajidha 19:37, 7 December 2009 (EST)
My question is relating to whether this page should be moved to "North Atlantic Treaty Organization", since we don't use acronyms when we don't have to. —Interrobang 22:39, 7 December 2009 (EST)
Sorry, misunderstood. 97.82.152.134 22:53, 7 December 2009 (EST)