Talk:Alignment: Difference between revisions

From MediaWiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
Geewunling (talk | contribs)
KilMichaelMcC (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Line 4: Line 4:
::Not a bad idea - mentioning them increases the likeliness of them being canonized in the future! - [[User:Chris McFeely|Chris McFeely]] 17:00, 19 March 2010 (EDT)
::Not a bad idea - mentioning them increases the likeliness of them being canonized in the future! - [[User:Chris McFeely|Chris McFeely]] 17:00, 19 March 2010 (EDT)
:::Which I'll admit was an underlying intent. I'd murder to get more of Direwolf, or maybe even see Killzone established as [[Killzone]]. [[User:Geewunling|Geewunling]] 17:06, 19 March 2010 (EDT)
:::Which I'll admit was an underlying intent. I'd murder to get more of Direwolf, or maybe even see Killzone established as [[Killzone]]. [[User:Geewunling|Geewunling]] 17:06, 19 March 2010 (EDT)
::::Uh, is this -- "Writers of official media, feel free to canonize  at will!" -- an okay thing for us to be saying? Would characters and other things created by Furman in a non-Hasbro-owned capacity not actually belong to Furman himself? Are they really free for other writers to use "at will," without his permission?--[[User:KilMichaelMcC|KilMichaelMcC]] 22:36, 19 March 2010 (EDT)

Revision as of 02:36, 20 March 2010

Glossary

I'm assuming this lists characters and concepts unique or original to this story, but I'm not 100% sure. Could someone add a note of clarification. Khajidha 16:02, 19 March 2010 (EDT)

Original to the story, or else the Stellar Galleries and Kolkular wouldn't be in there. I thought it was a shame not to offer some overview to the readers of the story's pseudocanon input to Transformers. Geewunling 16:10, 19 March 2010 (EDT)
Not a bad idea - mentioning them increases the likeliness of them being canonized in the future! - Chris McFeely 17:00, 19 March 2010 (EDT)
Which I'll admit was an underlying intent. I'd murder to get more of Direwolf, or maybe even see Killzone established as Killzone. Geewunling 17:06, 19 March 2010 (EDT)
Uh, is this -- "Writers of official media, feel free to canonize at will!" -- an okay thing for us to be saying? Would characters and other things created by Furman in a non-Hasbro-owned capacity not actually belong to Furman himself? Are they really free for other writers to use "at will," without his permission?--KilMichaelMcC 22:36, 19 March 2010 (EDT)