Talk:Alignment: Difference between revisions
From MediaWiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
No edit summary |
Jimsorenson (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
| Line 9: | Line 9: | ||
==Killzone== | ==Killzone== | ||
Okay then, Jim, please explain why my change was "bullshit." --[[User:KilMichaelMcC|KilMichaelMcC]] 21:08, 2 April 2010 (EDT) | Okay then, Jim, please explain why my change was "bullshit." --[[User:KilMichaelMcC|KilMichaelMcC]] 21:08, 2 April 2010 (EDT) | ||
:And again, just because it's a coincidence doesn't negate the status of the name being canonized. I am having a hard time even understanding your objection to having Killzone link to Killzone, especially since they are both Decepticons, both in the same continuity family ... I mean, what more do you want? --[[User:Jimsorenson|Jimsorenson]] 21:09, 2 April 2010 (EDT) | |||
Revision as of 01:09, 3 April 2010
Glossary
I'm assuming this lists characters and concepts unique or original to this story, but I'm not 100% sure. Could someone add a note of clarification. Khajidha 16:02, 19 March 2010 (EDT)
- Original to the story, or else the Stellar Galleries and Kolkular wouldn't be in there. I thought it was a shame not to offer some overview to the readers of the story's pseudocanon input to Transformers. Geewunling 16:10, 19 March 2010 (EDT)
- Not a bad idea - mentioning them increases the likeliness of them being canonized in the future! - Chris McFeely 17:00, 19 March 2010 (EDT)
- Which I'll admit was an underlying intent. I'd murder to get more of Direwolf, or maybe even see Killzone established as Killzone. Geewunling 17:06, 19 March 2010 (EDT)
- Uh, is this -- "Writers of official media, feel free to canonize at will!" -- an okay thing for us to be saying? Would characters and other things created by Furman in a non-Hasbro-owned capacity not actually belong to Furman himself? Are they really free for other writers to use "at will," without his permission?--KilMichaelMcC 22:36, 19 March 2010 (EDT)
- Remember, they're all derivative works based on Hasbro's intellectual property in the first place. The legalities are ... murky. Khajidha 23:23, 19 March 2010 (EDT)
- Uh, is this -- "Writers of official media, feel free to canonize at will!" -- an okay thing for us to be saying? Would characters and other things created by Furman in a non-Hasbro-owned capacity not actually belong to Furman himself? Are they really free for other writers to use "at will," without his permission?--KilMichaelMcC 22:36, 19 March 2010 (EDT)
- Which I'll admit was an underlying intent. I'd murder to get more of Direwolf, or maybe even see Killzone established as Killzone. Geewunling 17:06, 19 March 2010 (EDT)
- Not a bad idea - mentioning them increases the likeliness of them being canonized in the future! - Chris McFeely 17:00, 19 March 2010 (EDT)
Killzone
Okay then, Jim, please explain why my change was "bullshit." --KilMichaelMcC 21:08, 2 April 2010 (EDT)
- And again, just because it's a coincidence doesn't negate the status of the name being canonized. I am having a hard time even understanding your objection to having Killzone link to Killzone, especially since they are both Decepticons, both in the same continuity family ... I mean, what more do you want? --Jimsorenson 21:09, 2 April 2010 (EDT)
