Talk:Thundercracker (Movie): Difference between revisions
From MediaWiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
Deceptitran (talk | contribs) |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
Can somebody please upload a photo of him? If EVAC gets a toy photo so does Thundercracker and that would be fair. Its pretty fair when EVAC and Landmine gets a toy photo of themselves and so does Thundercracker. Everyone deserves a picture of themselves.([[User:Soldier 79|Soldier 79]] 17:41, 20 October 2007 (UTC)) | Can somebody please upload a photo of him? If EVAC gets a toy photo so does Thundercracker and that would be fair. Its pretty fair when EVAC and Landmine gets a toy photo of themselves and so does Thundercracker. Everyone deserves a picture of themselves.([[User:Soldier 79|Soldier 79]] 17:41, 20 October 2007 (UTC)) | ||
:Then upload it yourself. [[User:Interrobang|Interrobang]] 19:57, 20 October 2007 (UTC) | :Then upload it yourself. [[User:Interrobang|Interrobang]] 19:57, 20 October 2007 (UTC) | ||
Farcically ridiculously inaccurate F-22 mode? Are you sure the bottom is not a payload of some kind commonly found on F-22s. It would be interesting to view it that way when viewing the toy the payload section is completely distinct from the actual F-22 and if you remove the under parts it is a near accurate F-22 minus the giant guns which we can forgive. Just letting you know what an Air Force brat knows. Thanks. | |||
Revision as of 22:32, 30 May 2010
Can somebody please upload a photo of him? If EVAC gets a toy photo so does Thundercracker and that would be fair. Its pretty fair when EVAC and Landmine gets a toy photo of themselves and so does Thundercracker. Everyone deserves a picture of themselves.(Soldier 79 17:41, 20 October 2007 (UTC))
- Then upload it yourself. Interrobang 19:57, 20 October 2007 (UTC)
Farcically ridiculously inaccurate F-22 mode? Are you sure the bottom is not a payload of some kind commonly found on F-22s. It would be interesting to view it that way when viewing the toy the payload section is completely distinct from the actual F-22 and if you remove the under parts it is a near accurate F-22 minus the giant guns which we can forgive. Just letting you know what an Air Force brat knows. Thanks.
