Talk:Starscream Clone Black Version

... well, shoot, Chris. I was going off the Allspark report on these guys, and they must have had the name reversed, because I thought he was "Starscream Black Clone Ver". "Starscream Clone Black Ver" is a much stronger argument for the toy actually representing a new character.

Question in retrospect, though. Should he be at "Black clone" instead of "Black Clone", and does he need the nameless-designation template on him? --Monzo 12:00, 16 July 2010 (EDT)

I almost feel like he ought to be "Black Starscream clone", or something completely joyless like that. That does seem like a situation requirin' one'a them thar "nameless" templates.- Chris McFeely 12:04, 16 July 2010 (EDT)

Man, Interro found a way to make this even more joyless and overly literal than even me! - Chris McFeely 12:18, 17 July 2010 (EDT)

Should this at least be at "Version" over "Ver.", or what? --Monzo 12:36, 17 July 2010 (EDT)

Adhering to the only given descriptor of this character, hardly a first at this Wiki, makes me "joyless and overly literal". Okay then. —Interrobang 18:32, 17 July 2010 (EDT)

Ah, c'mon, man. What is "Starscream Clone Black Ver"? That's not... anything. It's not a name, it's barely coherent as a descriptor. It's a mushy collection of Engrish that consists of a toy's descriptive title appended to the end of a non-name. - Chris McFeely 18:52, 17 July 2010 (EDT)

And can we get a link to the Takara website in question? -Derik 12:21, 16 July 2010 (EDT)