User talk:Alientraveller/Alpha Trion: Difference between revisions
From MediaWiki
Jump to navigationJump to searchNo edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
So, what do my fellow editors think? [[User:Alientraveller|Alientraveller]] 08:29, 11 August 2010 (EDT) | So, what do my fellow editors think? [[User:Alientraveller|Alientraveller]] 08:29, 11 August 2010 (EDT) | ||
:I for one am in favour of this. I don't think any of the Alpha Trion pages are so long that combining them creates an unwieldy or infeasible article. - [[User:Chris McFeely|Chris McFeely]] 08:56, 11 August 2010 (EDT) | :I for one am in favour of this. I don't think any of the Alpha Trion pages are so long that combining them creates an unwieldy or infeasible article. - [[User:Chris McFeely|Chris McFeely]] 08:56, 11 August 2010 (EDT) | ||
:I like it and would have no problem with this merger. Our current note-dependent version was a compromise to assuage a few vocal opponents of cross-continuity, but I always thought that was a rather silly viewpoint so mergers cool with me. -ZacWilliam (not signed in) --[[Special:Contributions/76.28.76.206|76.28.76.206]] 08:58, 11 August 2010 (EDT) | |||
Revision as of 12:58, 11 August 2010
So, what do my fellow editors think? Alientraveller 08:29, 11 August 2010 (EDT)
- I for one am in favour of this. I don't think any of the Alpha Trion pages are so long that combining them creates an unwieldy or infeasible article. - Chris McFeely 08:56, 11 August 2010 (EDT)
- I like it and would have no problem with this merger. Our current note-dependent version was a compromise to assuage a few vocal opponents of cross-continuity, but I always thought that was a rather silly viewpoint so mergers cool with me. -ZacWilliam (not signed in) --76.28.76.206 08:58, 11 August 2010 (EDT)
