Talk:March 28: Difference between revisions
From MediaWiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
::Should we at least consider separating real world and fictional dates? --[[User:Khajidha|Khajidha]] 18:25, 9 December 2010 (EST) | ::Should we at least consider separating real world and fictional dates? --[[User:Khajidha|Khajidha]] 18:25, 9 December 2010 (EST) | ||
:::I don't think so. --[[User:ItsWalky|ItsWalky]] 19:23, 9 December 2010 (EST) | :::I don't think so. --[[User:ItsWalky|ItsWalky]] 19:23, 9 December 2010 (EST) | ||
::::The category for these dates is "Real-world events by day" so unless that category is changed, having fictional events listed doesn't make sense. Anything fictional should be in their appropriate continuity timeline. --[[User:MistaTee|MistaTee]] 07:14, 10 December 2010 (EST) | |||
Revision as of 12:14, 10 December 2010
Aren't these dates for real world events? --MistaTee 17:42, 9 December 2010 (EST)
- Don't have to be, no. We've had fictional events on these pages for a while. There's just not that many of them! --ItsWalky 18:01, 9 December 2010 (EST)
- Should we at least consider separating real world and fictional dates? --Khajidha 18:25, 9 December 2010 (EST)
- I don't think so. --ItsWalky 19:23, 9 December 2010 (EST)
- The category for these dates is "Real-world events by day" so unless that category is changed, having fictional events listed doesn't make sense. Anything fictional should be in their appropriate continuity timeline. --MistaTee 07:14, 10 December 2010 (EST)
- I don't think so. --ItsWalky 19:23, 9 December 2010 (EST)
- Should we at least consider separating real world and fictional dates? --Khajidha 18:25, 9 December 2010 (EST)
