Talk:G.I. Joe (team): Difference between revisions
From MediaWiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
mNo edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
:Eventually, why not? They've appeared in Transformers comics. I mean, we have pages for Spider-Man, US1, and that big fire-snortin' lizard... - [[User:RolonBolon|RolonBolon]] 23:18, 8 June 2006 (UTC) | :Eventually, why not? They've appeared in Transformers comics. I mean, we have pages for Spider-Man, US1, and that big fire-snortin' lizard... - [[User:RolonBolon|RolonBolon]] 23:18, 8 June 2006 (UTC) | ||
::I'm not opposed to it, per se. If someone really wants to do all those entries, go right ahead. Just seems unnecessary.--[[User:G.B. Blackrock|G.B. Blackrock]] 13:33, 9 June 2006 (UTC)<div id="wikia-credits"><br /><br /><small>From [http://transformers.wikia.com Teletraan I: The Transformers Wiki], a [http://www.wikia.com Wikia] wiki.</small></div> | ::I'm not opposed to it, per se. If someone really wants to do all those entries, go right ahead. Just seems unnecessary.--[[User:G.B. Blackrock|G.B. Blackrock]] 13:33, 9 June 2006 (UTC) | ||
:::To some extent, I'm sure we can do the really minimal characters as part as someone's "Related characters" section. You know, ones who do very little but show up, and only show up in one of the crossovers. --[[User:ItsWalky|ItsWalky]] 14:28, 9 June 2006 (UTC)<div id="wikia-credits"><br /><br /><small>From [http://transformers.wikia.com Teletraan I: The Transformers Wiki], a [http://www.wikia.com Wikia] wiki.</small></div> | |||
Revision as of 14:28, 9 June 2006
We're not really going to do entries for all of these Joe characters, are we? I mean, I can see a few being justified, but this seems like an awful lot of links....--G.B. Blackrock 22:57, 8 June 2006 (UTC)
- Eventually, why not? They've appeared in Transformers comics. I mean, we have pages for Spider-Man, US1, and that big fire-snortin' lizard... - RolonBolon 23:18, 8 June 2006 (UTC)
- I'm not opposed to it, per se. If someone really wants to do all those entries, go right ahead. Just seems unnecessary.--G.B. Blackrock 13:33, 9 June 2006 (UTC)
- To some extent, I'm sure we can do the really minimal characters as part as someone's "Related characters" section. You know, ones who do very little but show up, and only show up in one of the crossovers. --ItsWalky 14:28, 9 June 2006 (UTC)
- I'm not opposed to it, per se. If someone really wants to do all those entries, go right ahead. Just seems unnecessary.--G.B. Blackrock 13:33, 9 June 2006 (UTC)
