Talk:C.H.U.G.: Difference between revisions

From MediaWiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
MistaTee (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
FFN (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Line 2: Line 2:
:No and no. [[User:Interrobang|—Interrobang]] 11:28, 2 June 2011 (EDT)
:No and no. [[User:Interrobang|—Interrobang]] 11:28, 2 June 2011 (EDT)
::I see it used a lot, otherwise I wouldn't have created it.--[[User:MistaTee|MistaTee]] 13:37, 2 June 2011 (EDT)
::I see it used a lot, otherwise I wouldn't have created it.--[[User:MistaTee|MistaTee]] 13:37, 2 June 2011 (EDT)
:::It's used quite a lot, though it's usually "CHUG". --[[User:FFN|FFN]] 13:44, 2 June 2011 (EDT)

Revision as of 17:44, 2 June 2011

Do we need this? Is this term really that widely used? --Khajidha 11:17, 2 June 2011 (EDT)

No and no. —Interrobang 11:28, 2 June 2011 (EDT)
I see it used a lot, otherwise I wouldn't have created it.--MistaTee 13:37, 2 June 2011 (EDT)
It's used quite a lot, though it's usually "CHUG". --FFN 13:44, 2 June 2011 (EDT)