User talk:65.93.116.207: Difference between revisions
From MediaWiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
New page: We require our fiction sections to be written "in-universe." This means no writing stuff like "in the next episode" and "in episode 8, blankity does blah blah blah." I tried to rewrite w... |
Interrobang (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
We require our fiction sections to be written "in-universe." This means no writing stuff like "in the next episode" and "in episode 8, blankity does blah blah blah." I tried to rewrite what you wrote, since it was a lot of material, but it would require me to know what actually happens in the episode, so I kept the revert intact. "Let's not talk about episode 10!" is not helpful to others. --[[User:ItsWalky|ItsWalky]] 20:26, 16 June 2011 (EDT) | We require our fiction sections to be written "in-universe." This means no writing stuff like "in the next episode" and "in episode 8, blankity does blah blah blah." I tried to rewrite what you wrote, since it was a lot of material, but it would require me to know what actually happens in the episode, so I kept the revert intact. "Let's not talk about episode 10!" is not helpful to others. --[[User:ItsWalky|ItsWalky]] 20:26, 16 June 2011 (EDT) | ||
:I would have reverted it even if it wasn't breaking the fourth wall. It was ridiculously vague and really came off as somebody who didn't understand Japanese. [[User:Interrobang|—Interrobang]] 21:04, 16 June 2011 (EDT) | |||
Revision as of 01:04, 17 June 2011
We require our fiction sections to be written "in-universe." This means no writing stuff like "in the next episode" and "in episode 8, blankity does blah blah blah." I tried to rewrite what you wrote, since it was a lot of material, but it would require me to know what actually happens in the episode, so I kept the revert intact. "Let's not talk about episode 10!" is not helpful to others. --ItsWalky 20:26, 16 June 2011 (EDT)
- I would have reverted it even if it wasn't breaking the fourth wall. It was ridiculously vague and really came off as somebody who didn't understand Japanese. —Interrobang 21:04, 16 June 2011 (EDT)
