Talk:Shellformer: Difference between revisions
From MediaWiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 10: | Line 10: | ||
Should we mention Grimlock, Slag, and Sludge in the article? They do use shellforming to an extent. [[User:ZeldaTheSwordsman|ZeldaTheSwordsman]] 21:29, 27 April 2010 (EDT) | Should we mention Grimlock, Slag, and Sludge in the article? They do use shellforming to an extent. [[User:ZeldaTheSwordsman|ZeldaTheSwordsman]] 21:29, 27 April 2010 (EDT) | ||
: That is not shellformering. That's just kibble. --[[User:ItsWalky|ItsWalky]] 21:41, 27 April 2010 (EDT) | : That is not shellformering. That's just kibble. --[[User:ItsWalky|ItsWalky]] 21:41, 27 April 2010 (EDT) | ||
Should Voyager-Class [[Sentinel Prime (ROTF)]] be added? [[User:Inkblot|Inkblot]] 09:45, 10 December 2011 (EST) | |||
Revision as of 14:45, 10 December 2011
Almost always alternate form which unpeels... in what case does the robot unpeel?
I'd suggest G1 Scourge as probable earliest use of this type of design.
87.127.199.145 20:38, 26 February 2008 (UTC)
- I'm interested in any "reverse-shellformer" examples as well. Anyone? Can we remove that modifier until an example comes along? Buttbutt 00:56, 13 March 2008 (UTC)
- Hmm, maybe G1 Ultra Magnus or RID Prime? --MistaTee 02:27, 13 March 2008 (UTC)
- Slumblebee is both a shellformer and a reverse-shellformer. - Starfield 14:23, 8 October 2009 (EDT)
Should we mention Grimlock, Slag, and Sludge in the article? They do use shellforming to an extent. ZeldaTheSwordsman 21:29, 27 April 2010 (EDT)
- That is not shellformering. That's just kibble. --ItsWalky 21:41, 27 April 2010 (EDT)
Should Voyager-Class Sentinel Prime (ROTF) be added? Inkblot 09:45, 10 December 2011 (EST)
