Talk:Galvatron (G1)/Generation 1 cartoon continuity: Difference between revisions
From MediaWiki
Jump to navigationJump to searchmNo edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
Since this incarnation of Galvatron is basically Megatron and there's no time-travel weirdness like with comics Galvatron, shouldn't we merge this with [[Megatron (G1)/Generation 1 cartoon continuity]]? Or do we still consider this setup more sensible? [[User:Interrobang|—Interrobang]] 17:33, 8 September 2011 (EDT) | Since this incarnation of Galvatron is basically Megatron and there's no time-travel weirdness like with comics Galvatron, shouldn't we merge this with [[Megatron (G1)/Generation 1 cartoon continuity]]? Or do we still consider this setup more sensible? [[User:Interrobang|—Interrobang]] 17:33, 8 September 2011 (EDT) | ||
: This page gives length/size warnings all by itself. Merging it with another huge-ass page seems like a backwards step to me.--[[User:ItsWalky|ItsWalky]] 18:20, 8 September 2011 (EDT) | : This page gives length/size warnings all by itself. Merging it with another huge-ass page seems like a backwards step to me.--[[User:ItsWalky|ItsWalky]] 18:20, 8 September 2011 (EDT) | ||
I think merging is a good idea.[[Special:Contributions/71.255.172.244|71.255.172.244]] 21:42, 1 March 2012 (EST) | |||
Revision as of 02:42, 2 March 2012
Since this incarnation of Galvatron is basically Megatron and there's no time-travel weirdness like with comics Galvatron, shouldn't we merge this with Megatron (G1)/Generation 1 cartoon continuity? Or do we still consider this setup more sensible? —Interrobang 17:33, 8 September 2011 (EDT)
- This page gives length/size warnings all by itself. Merging it with another huge-ass page seems like a backwards step to me.--ItsWalky 18:20, 8 September 2011 (EDT)
I think merging is a good idea.71.255.172.244 21:42, 1 March 2012 (EST)
