Talk:Michael Dorn: Difference between revisions
From MediaWiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
Well there's this. If you listen closley, that is Dorn as Prime.[http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HtUy2bzakKs] | Well there's this. If you listen closley, that is Dorn as Prime.[http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HtUy2bzakKs] | ||
:That is not a source. A source means a proper, reliable credit. --[[User:Detour|Detour]] 22:05, 21 March 2012 (EDT) | :That is not a source. A source means a proper, reliable credit. --[[User:Detour|Detour]] 22:05, 21 March 2012 (EDT) | ||
::It also makes no sense; why pay Michael Dorn to impersonate Peter Cullen when you can just hire Peter Cullen and likely save money by doing so? -- [[User:Dark T Zeratul|Dark T Zeratul]] 22:34, 21 March 2012 (EDT) | ::It also makes no sense; why pay Michael Dorn to impersonate Peter Cullen when you can just hire Peter Cullen and likely save money by doing so? And if Cullen was unavailable, why spring for Michael Dorn for a commercial voiceover instead of getting a cheaper, lesser-known VA to impersonate him? -- [[User:Dark T Zeratul|Dark T Zeratul]] 22:34, 21 March 2012 (EDT) | ||
Revision as of 02:34, 22 March 2012
Yeeeeeeah, uh, I really don't think that's actually Michael Dorn. - Chris McFeely 21:22, 21 March 2012 (EDT)
- Yeah, gonna need a source on that. --Detour 21:51, 21 March 2012 (EDT)
Well there's this. If you listen closley, that is Dorn as Prime.[1]
- That is not a source. A source means a proper, reliable credit. --Detour 22:05, 21 March 2012 (EDT)
- It also makes no sense; why pay Michael Dorn to impersonate Peter Cullen when you can just hire Peter Cullen and likely save money by doing so? And if Cullen was unavailable, why spring for Michael Dorn for a commercial voiceover instead of getting a cheaper, lesser-known VA to impersonate him? -- Dark T Zeratul 22:34, 21 March 2012 (EDT)
