Talk:Onslaught (WFC): Difference between revisions
From MediaWiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
→About the picture captions...: new section |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 9: | Line 9: | ||
I think the caption for the first picture should be changed. Because he has been confirmed as a roaring dudicus. --[[User:Diamondmatter|Diamondmatter]] 09:31, 11 April 2012 (EDT) | I think the caption for the first picture should be changed. Because he has been confirmed as a roaring dudicus. --[[User:Diamondmatter|Diamondmatter]] 09:31, 11 April 2012 (EDT) | ||
==G2 deco repurpose?== | |||
Although I understand that the G2 deco is the G1 character, because of the box info, if the G2 deco ends up as DLC for the FOC game, then wouldn't that mean they repurposed the G2 toy into the WFC character? [[Special:Contributions/71.238.50.144|71.238.50.144]] 07:37, 23 July 2012 (EDT) | |||
Revision as of 11:37, 23 July 2012
Are we actually treating him as a Constructicon? As it says on the Exodus page that seems likely to have been a typo. --ZacWilliam 08:30, 17 July 2010 (EDT)
- I was wondering that myself. Unless it is revealed that he was a Constructicon who was reformatted into a more "combative" mode, it seems that that should be dropped. --Khajidha 08:33, 17 July 2010 (EDT)
Most played DLC character
- I saw a lot of TF WFC fans playing Onslaught then other DLC characters. Should we consider that Onslaught is the most played DLC character of this game. 81.131.235.156 19:17, 17 November 2010 (EST)
- That's really just pointless trivia, and it's pretty subjective since I, personally, don't see Onslaught that much. --NCZ 19:20, 17 November 2010 (EST)
About the picture captions...
I think the caption for the first picture should be changed. Because he has been confirmed as a roaring dudicus. --Diamondmatter 09:31, 11 April 2012 (EDT)
G2 deco repurpose?
Although I understand that the G2 deco is the G1 character, because of the box info, if the G2 deco ends up as DLC for the FOC game, then wouldn't that mean they repurposed the G2 toy into the WFC character? 71.238.50.144 07:37, 23 July 2012 (EDT)
