Talk:Lightning Strike Coalition: Difference between revisions
From MediaWiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
m Talk:Lightning Strike Coalition moved to Talk:Lightning Strike Coalition (G1): That's not how we move articles. |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
No, at least as I recall they mearly mention the name as a group of Autobots at a gathering, but don't go into any detail as to who they are. Least that's what I recall.--[[User:ZacWilliam|ZacWilliam]] 10:49, 14 July 2010 (EDT) | No, at least as I recall they mearly mention the name as a group of Autobots at a gathering, but don't go into any detail as to who they are. Least that's what I recall.--[[User:ZacWilliam|ZacWilliam]] 10:49, 14 July 2010 (EDT) | ||
As far as I'm aware, subfactions like the [[Wrecker]]s don't get split up into groups by continuity family. Wouldn't that include this? --[[User:ItsWalky|ItsWalky]] 23:44, 24 August 2012 (EDT) | |||
Revision as of 03:44, 25 August 2012
Prime continuity?
I haven't finished it yet, but doesn't Exodus use the term Lightning Strike Coalition to refer to the pre-Autobot/Decepticon era combiners? -- G1MarvelBlaster 10:46, 14 July 2010 (EDT)
No, at least as I recall they mearly mention the name as a group of Autobots at a gathering, but don't go into any detail as to who they are. Least that's what I recall.--ZacWilliam 10:49, 14 July 2010 (EDT)
As far as I'm aware, subfactions like the Wreckers don't get split up into groups by continuity family. Wouldn't that include this? --ItsWalky 23:44, 24 August 2012 (EDT)
